Evaluating Factors Influencing University Students' Satisfaction and Continued Use of Health Smartwatches in Chengdu

Authors

  • Fan Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/au-ejir.2025.23
CITATION
DOI: 10.14456/au-ejir.2025.23
Published: 2025-08-30

Keywords:

Perceived Usefulness, Satisfaction, Continuance Intention, Health Smartwatches, University Students

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to identify the key factors influencing university students' satisfaction and continued use of health smartwatches in Chengdu Factors evaluated in the study include perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, enjoyment, AI user experience, AI trust, satisfaction, and continuance intention. Research design, data and methodology: The researchers employed quantitative techniques (n = 500) to conduct a questionnaire survey among undergraduate students at Chengdu Medical College. The sample was selected using non-probability sampling methods, including judgmental sampling, quota sampling, and convenience sampling. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) were used to analyze the data and test the proposed research hypotheses. Results: The analysis shows that perceived usefulness, enjoyment, AI experience, and AI trust significantly influence student satisfaction in using smartwatches. Additionally, perceived usefulness is statistically proven to be driven by perceived ease of use. Student satisfaction, in turn, influences continued use of health smartwatches. Conclusions: The statistics support the six research hypotheses proposed. Thus, it is recommended to optimize the ease of use of smartwatches by enhancing their functionality for greater user-friendliness. Additionally, incorporating more accurate monitoring data and enhancing online protection can promote satisfaction and continued use.

Author Biography

Fan Yang

Vincent Mary School of Engineering, Science and Technology Assumption University of Thailand

References

Al-Mamary, Y. H., & Shamsuddin, A. (2015). Testing of the technology acceptance model in context of Yemen. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p268

Alnasser, A., Kyle, J., Aloumi, N., Al-Khalifa, A. S., & Marais, D. (2019). The impact of mobile health interventions on healthy eating knowledge and behaviour: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Nutrition Reviews, 77(7), 469-486.

https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuz011

Awang. (2012). Research methodology and data analysis (2nd ed.). UiTM Press.

Beh, P. K., Ganesan, Y., Iranmanesh, M., & Foroughi, B. (2021). Using smartwatches for fitness and health monitoring: The UTAUT2 combined with threat appraisal as moderators. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(3), 282-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1685597

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.

Bölen, M. C. (2020). Exploring the determinants of users’ continuance intention in smartwatches. Technology in Society, 60, 101209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101209

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.

Chengdu Medical College Academic Affairs Office. (2024). Internal undergraduate student population statistics by major. Unpublished institutional data.

Cheung, M. L., Chau, K. Y., Lam, M. H. S., Tse, G., Ho, K. Y., Flint, S. W., Broom, D. R., Tso, E. K. H., & Lee, K. Y. (2019). Examining consumers’ adoption of wearable healthcare technology: The role of health attributes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132257

Choi, J., & Kim, S. (2016). Is the smartwatch an IT product or a fashion product? A study on factors affecting the intention to use smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 777-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.007

Chuah, S. H. W., Rauschnabel, P. A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., & Lade, S. (2016). Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 276-284.

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203775582

Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15192

Ghazali, E., Mutum, D. S., & Woon, M. Y. (2020). Exploring the adoption of wearable payment systems: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Technology Diffusion, 11(1), 1-14.

Glowacki, K., Duncan, M. J., Gainforth, H., & Faulkner, G. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to physical activity and exercise among adults with depression: A scoping review. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 13, 108-119.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2017.10.001

Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I., Ahmad, A., Akhter, F., & Aljarallah, A. (2022). A dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis to explore consumer adoption of smart wearable healthcare devices. Journal of Global Information Management, 30(1), 1-30.

Krey, N., Chuah, S. H. W., Ramayah, T., & Rauschnabel, P. A. (2019). How functional and emotional ads drive smartwatch adoption: The moderating role of consumer innovativeness and extraversion. Internet Research, 29(3), 578-602.

https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0534

Lee, S. Y., & Lee, K. (2018). Factors that influence an individual's intention to adopt a wearable healthcare device: The case of a wearable fitness tracker. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 154-163.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.002

Li, H. (2021). An empirical research on the construction of a government website public satisfaction index model in China. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(5), 112-137. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.20210901.oa7

Lim, Y. J., Osman, A., Salahuddin, S. N., Romle, A. R., & Abdullah, S. (2016). Factors influencing online shopping behavior: The mediating role of purchase intention. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 401-410.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00050-2

Lunney, A., Cunningham, N. R., & Eastin, M. S. (2016). Wearable fitness technology: A structural investigation into acceptance and perceived fitness outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.007

Marakhimov, A., & Joo, J. (2017). Consumer adaptation and infusion of wearable devices for healthcare. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.016

Najjar, M. S., Dahabiyeh, L., & Algharabat, R. S. (2021). Users' affect and satisfaction in a privacy calculus context. Online Information Review, 45(3), 577-598. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0188

Nascimento, B., Oliveira, T., & Tam, C. (2018). Wearable technology: What explains continuance intention in smartwatches?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.03.017

Nelson, L. A., Mulvaney, S. A., Gebretsadik, T., Johnson, K. B., & Osborn, C. Y. (2022). The MEssaging for Diabetes (MED) intervention improves medication adherence and glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 37(7), 1758-1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07160-4

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 418-430.

Reeder, B., & David, A. (2016). Health at hand: A systematic review of smart watch uses for health and wellness. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 63, 269-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.09.001

Rehman, I. H. U., Ahmad, A., Akhter, F., & Aljarallah, A. (2021). A dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis to explore consumer adoption of smart wearable healthcare devices. Journal of Global Information Management, 29(6), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.20211101.oa29

Rovinelli, R. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37(2), 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447703700220

Rupp, M. A., Michaelis, J. R., McConnell, D. S., & Smither, J. A. (2018). The role of individual differences on perceptions of wearable fitness device trust, usability, and motivational impact. Applied Ergonomics, 70, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.02.005

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self‐regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self‐determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557-1586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x

Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 935-943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007

Shin, D. H., Lee, S., & Hwang, Y. (2017). How do credibility and utility play in the user experience of health informatics services? Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009

Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). The Italian versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory–II: Psychometric properties and discriminant power. In M. A. Lange (Ed.), Leading‐edge psychological tests and testing research (pp. 27-50). Nova Science Publishers.

Siepmann, C., & Kowalczuk, P. (2021). Understanding continued smartwatch usage: The role of emotional as well as health and fitness factors. Electronic Markets, 31(4), 795-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00475-6

Uzir, M. U. H., Al Halbusi, H., Lim, R., Jerin, I., Hamid, A. B. A., Ramayah, T., & Haque, A. (2021). Applied Artificial Intelligence and user satisfaction: Smartwatch usage for healthcare in Bangladesh during COVID-19. Technology in Society, 67, 101780.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101780

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872

Windasari, N. A., & Lin, F. R. (2021). Why do people continue using fitness wearables? The effect of interactivity and gamification. SAGE Open, 11(4), 21582440211056606. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211056606

Wu, J.-H., & Wang, Y.-M. (2006). Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Information & Management, 43(6), 728-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002

Zhang, M., Luo, M., Nie, R., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Technical attributes, health attributes, consumer attributes, and their roles in adoption intention of healthcare wearable technology. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 108, 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.09.013

Zhou, Y., Kong, N., Duan, Y., & Chen, J. (2021). Research on innovation path of wearable medical devices based on industry chain perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1971(1), 012103. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1971/1/012103

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30

How to Cite

Yang, F. (2025). Evaluating Factors Influencing University Students’ Satisfaction and Continued Use of Health Smartwatches in Chengdu. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (ISSN: 2408-1906), 10(2), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.14456/au-ejir.2025.23