Factors Impacting Students’ Confirmation, Learning Engagement, Satisfaction, and Continuous Intention of Online English Learning in Vocational Colleges in Hangzhou, China
Keywords:
Online English Learning, Confirmation, Learning Engagement, Satisfaction, Continuous IntentionAbstract
Purpose: This paper examines first-year and second-year students’ satisfaction and continuous intention toward online English learning in Hangzhou, China. The conceptual framework includes interactivity, perceived usefulness, confirmation, self-efficacy, learning engagement, satisfaction, and continuous intention. Research design, data, and methodology: The study adopted a quantitative research strategy and collected data from 500 participants in Zhejiang Business College in Hangzhou using online questionnaire distribution approach. Project-objective consistency (IOC) is used to examine content validity and Cronbach’s Alpha to test the reliability of each construct. Sampling techniques are judgment sampling, quota sampling, and convenience sampling. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) are adopted to test structural models and to explain eight hypotheses out of seven variables in the conceptual framework. Results: The results explicated that interactivity greatly affects the confirmation of perceived usefulness and significantly influences learning engagement. Interactivity presented the strongest impact on learning satisfaction, followed by perceived usefulness, learning engagement, and confirmation. Learning satisfaction greatly affects continuous intention. Nevertheless, a non-support relationship exists between students’ self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. Conclusions: Lecturers, relevant management personnel from school academic affairs, and online English learning platform designers are very necessary to optimize students’ interactivity and perceived usefulness to enhance confirmation and learning engagement, respectively.
References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (1st ed.). Prentice-Hall.
Almahamid, S., & Rub, F. A. (2011). Factors that determine continuance intention to use e-learning system: An empirical investigation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Telecommunication Technology and Applications, 5, 242- 246.
Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2018). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 2003-2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088.
Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: an updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149
Bangert, A. W. (2006). Identifying factors underlying the quality of online teaching effectiveness: An exploratory study. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 17(2), 79-99.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03032699
Bashir, K. (2019). Modeling E-Learning interactivity, learner satisfaction and continuance learning intention in Ugandan Higher Learning Institutions. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 15(1), 14-34.
Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. (1983). Selected determinants of consumer satisfaction and complaint reports. J. Mark. Res. 20, 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378302000103
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351. https://doi.org/10. 2307/3250921.
Bolliger, D. U. (2004). Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in Online Courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.
Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
Byers, A. S. (2010). Examining Learner-Content Interaction Importance and Efficacy in Online, Self-directed Electronic Professional Development in Science for Elementary Educators in Grades Three-Six. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Cao, X., Masood, A., Luqman, A., & Ali, A. (2018). Excessive use of mobile social networking sites and poor academic performance: Antecedents and consequences from stressor-strain-outcome perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.023.
Chen, P., Chavez, O., Ong, D. C., & Gunderson, B. (2017). Strategic resource use for learning: A self-administered intervention that guides self-reflection on effective resource use enhances academic performance. Psychological science, 28(6), 774-785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617696456
Cheng, E. (2022). Determiner-Number Specification and Non-Local Agreement Computation in L1 and L2 Processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(4), 847-863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09864-w
Cheng, X., Gu, Y., & Shen, J. (2019). An Integrated View of Particularized Trust in Social Commerce: An Empirical. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.014
Cheng, Y. M. (2014). An Exploration into Cost-Influencing Factors on Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 850-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.003
Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., Sun, S. Y., Lin, T. C., & Sun, P. C. (2005). Usability, quality, value, and e-learning continuance decisions. Computers and Education, 45(4), 399-416.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.06.001
Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 2(1), 209-240.
Dai, H. M., Teo, T., & Rappa, N. A. (2020). Understanding continuance intention among MOOC participants: The role of habit and MOOC performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106455. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106455.
Darawong, C., & Sandmaung, M. (2019). Service quality enhancing student satisfaction in international programs of higher education institutions: a local student perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 29(6), 268-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2019.1647483
Denovan, A., Dagnall, N., Macaskill, A., & Papageorgiou, K. (2020). Future time perspective, positive emotions, and student engagement: a longitudinal study. Stud High Educ, 45(7), 1533-1546. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1616168.
Dixson, M. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning,19(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561.
Djouad, T., & Mille, A. (2018). Observing and understanding an on-line learning activity: A model-based approach for activity indicator engineering. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 23(1), 41-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9337-9
Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation—The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 264-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00758.x.
Espasa, A., & Meneses, J. (2010). Analyzing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: An exploratory study. Higher Education, 59(3), 277-292.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9247-4
Evans, C., & Gibbons, N. J. (2007). The interactivity effect in multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1147-1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.008
Fife, J. E., Bond, S., & Byars-Winston, A. (2011). Correlates and predictors of academic self-efficacy among African-American students. Education, 132(1), 141-148.
Findlay-Thompson, S., & Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 63-71.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
Gamage, K. A., Silva, E. K. D., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery and assessment during COVID-19: Safeguarding academic integrity. Education Sciences, 10(11), 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110301
Gao, B. W., Jiang, J., & Tang, Y. (2020). The effect of blended learning platform and engagement on students’ satisfaction—the case from the tourism management teaching. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, and Tourism Education, 27, 100-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100272.
Gunawardena, C. N., Linder-VanBerschot, J. A., LaPointe, D. K., & Rao, L. (2010). Predictors of learner satisfaction and transfer of learning in a corporate online education program. The American Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 207-226.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed), Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Halilovic, S., & Cicic, M. (2013). Antecedents of information systems user behavior-extended expectation-confirmation model, Behavior & Information Technology, 3(4), 359-370.
Hallock, W. B., Roggeveen, A., & Crittenden, V. L. (2016). Social Media and Customer Engagement: Dyadic Word-of-Mouth. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science, 439-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11815-4_121
Handa, M., & Gulati, A. (2014). Employee Engagement: Does Individual Personality Matter. Journal of Management Research, 14, 57-67.
Hasan, B. (2003). The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(4), 443-450.
Ho, C. H. (2010). Continuance intention of e-learning platform: Toward an integrated model. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 8(3), 206-215.
Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modelling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Sage Publications.
Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2001). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. American educational research association annual conference.
Huang, Y. M. (2019). Examining students continued use of desktop services: Perspectives from expectation confirmation and social influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 23-31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.010.
Hui, Y. K., Li, C., & Qian, S. (2019). Learning engagement via promoting situational interest in a blended learning environment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(2), 408-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09216-z.
Jamaludin, S., Azmir, N. A., Mohamad Ayob, A. F., & Zainal, N. (2020). COVID-19 exit strategy: Transitioning towards a new normal. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 59, 165-170.
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.046.
Johnson, Z. D., & LaBelle, S. (2020). Confirmation in the college classroom: The connections between teacher's use of confirming messages and student's own communicative behaviors. Commun. Res. Rep., 37, 172-181.
Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122, 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003.
Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122, 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
Laing, R. D. (1961). The self and others. Pantheon.
Le, H., & Fan, Y. (2019). How do outstanding MOOC learners learn—mining the behavioral pattern of MOOC learning. China Electrochemical Education, 385(2), 72-79.
Lee, D., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2020). The relationships between self-efficacy, task value, and self-regulated learning strategies in massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5. 4389.
Lee, M. (2010). Explaining and predicting users' continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers in Education, 54(2), 506-516. https://doi-org.oenrr. top/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002.
Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between Student Engagement and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(3), 517-528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
Limayem, M., & Cheung, C. (2011). Predicting the continued use of internet-based learning technologies: the role of habit. Behav. Inf. Technol. 30(1), 91-99.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2010.490956
Lin, K. Y., & Lu, H. P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152-1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009
Lin, Y.-M., Lin, G.-Y., & Lafey, J. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.38.1.a.
Liu, G. Q. (2010). Analysis of the characteristics of American primary and secondary school education websites and their implications for China. Prim. Second. Sch. Electron. Educ., 43-45.
Lu, Y., Wang, B., & Lu, Y. (2019). Understanding Key Drivers of MOOC Satisfaction and Continuance intention to use. J. Electron. Commer. Res, 1(2), 105-117.
Maini, A. K., & Agrawal, V. (2021). Satellite Technology: Principles and Applications (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562-582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
Mo, C. Y., Hsieh, T. H., Lin, C. L., Jin, Y. Q., & Su, Y. S. (2021). Exploring the Critical Factors, the Online Learning Continuance Usage during COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(10), 5471.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105471.
Motlagh, S. E., Amrari, K., Yazdani, M. J., Abderahim, H. A., & Suori, H. (2001). The relationship between self-efficacy and academic achievement in high school students. Proceedia Social and Behavioral Science, 15, 765-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.180
Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., López Sánchez, J. Á., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students’ satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141, 103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103608.
Nolan-Grant, C. R. (2019). The Community of Inquiry framework as learning design model: a case study in postgraduate online education. Research in Learning Technology, 27, 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2240
Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 418. https://doi.org/10.1086/209358
Ozturk, A. B. (2016). Customer acceptance of cashless payment systems in the hospitality industry, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(4), 801-817.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2015-0073.
Paciello, M., Ghezzi, V., Tramontano, C., Barbaranelli, C., & Fida, R. (2016). Self-efficacy configurations and wellbeing in the academic context: A person-centered approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 16-21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.083
Pedroso, R., Zanetello, L., Guimaraes, L., Pettenon, M., Goncalves, V., Scherer, J., Kessler, F., & Pechansky, F. (2016). Confirmatory factor anlaysis (CFA) of the crack use relapse scale (CURS). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry, 43(3), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-60830000000081
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002.
Rodriguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2016). E-learning continuance: The impact of interactivity and the mediating role of imagery, presence, and flow. Information and Management, 53, 504-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.11.005
Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). The Italian versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory-II: Psychometric properties and discriminant power. In M. A. Lange (Ed.), Leading-edge psychological tests and testing research (pp. 27-50). Nova Science Publishers.
Sieburg, E. (1976). Confirming and disconfirming organizational communication. In J. L. Owen, P. A. Page, & G. I. Zimmerman (Eds.), Communication in organizations. West Publishing.
Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082.
Soper, D. S. (2018). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models.
http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc3/calc.aspx.
Stone, R. W., & Baker-Eveleth, L. (2013). Students' expectation, confirmation, and continuance intention to use electronic textbooks. Computer Human Behavior, 29, 984-990.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.007
Taghizadeh, S. K., Rahman, S. A., Nikbin, D., Alam, M. M. D., Alexa, L., Suan, L., & Taghizadeh, S. (2022). Factors influencing students’ continuance usage intention with online learning during the pandemic: A cross-country analysis. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(9), 1998-2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1912181.
Van den Berg, G. (2020). Context Matters: Student experiences of interaction in Open Distance Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 21(4), 223-235.
https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.803411
Virtanen, M. A., Kääriäinen, M., Liikanen, E., & Haavisto, E. (2017). The comparison of students’ satisfaction between ubiquitous and web-basedlearning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2565-2581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9561-2.
Wan, K., Zheng, X., & Ren, Y. (2020). Are you ready for large-scale online learning? Thinking about online learning and intelligent technology application in the post-epidemic period. Distance Education Journal, 38(3), 105-112.
Wang, C., & Pape, S. J. (2007). A Probe into Three Chinese Boys' Self-Efficacy Beliefs Learning English as a Second Language. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 21(4), 364-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540709594601
Wang, W., & Gan, C. (2014). Study on the influencing factors of the willingness to continue using academic blogs. Scientific Research Management, 10, 121-127.
https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000- 2995.2014.10.016.
Yang, G. F. (2016). Influence factors of MOOC user’s continuous behavior. Open Education Research, 22, 100-111. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2016.01.012 (2016).
Yang, H., Cai, J., Yang, H. H., & Wang, X. (2022). Examining key factors of beginner’s continuance intention in blended learning in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09322-5.
Zapko, K. A., Ferrant, M. L. G., Blasiman, R., & Shelestak, D. (2018). Evaluating best educational practices, student satisfaction and self confidence in simulation: A descriptive study. Nurse Educ. Today, 60, 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.006
Zazelenchuk, T. W. (1997). Interactivity in multimedia: Reconsidering our perspective. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 26(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.21432/t2gg6f
Zhu, Y., Zhang, J. H., Au, W., & Yates, G. (2020). University students’ online learning attitudes and continuous intention to undertake online courses: a self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1485-1519. https://doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09753-w.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Wang Hui

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submitting author warrants that the submission is original and that she/he is the author of the submission together with the named co-authors; to the extend the submission incorporates text passages, figures, data, or other material from the work of others, the submitting author has obtained any necessary permission.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY What does this mean?). This is to get more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for you, the authors.