Factors Impacting Sophomores’ Satisfaction and Behavioral Intention to Use Online Learning: A Case Study of a Public University in Yunnan, China

Main Article Content

Zhiyun Li

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the factors impacting student satisfaction and behavioral intention to use online learning at a public university in Yunnan Province, China. The framework proposes causal relationships among service quality, instructor quality, task-technology fit, learning content quality, perceived usefulness, satisfaction, and behavioral intention. Research Design, Data, and Methods: Researchers used a quantitative method (n=500) to distribute questionnaires to sophomore students in four colleges from Yuxi Normal University in China. The researcher used purposive, stratified random, and convenience sampling to collect the data. Before data collection, the Item Objective Congruence (IOC) and Cronbach’s alpha were used to ensure reliability and validity. Structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to analyze the data, including model fit, reliability, and validity tests. Results: The service quality, instructor quality, and task-technology fit significantly impact perceived usefulness. The learning content quality, perceived usefulness, and satisfaction significantly impact student behavioral intention. Conclusion: Seven hypotheses have been proven to meet the research objectives. Therefore, school administrators and teachers should maintain a good online learning environment, improve academic performance, increase teaching care, and establish a good image of the school to enhance students’ satisfaction and behavioral intention about online learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Li, Z. (2025). Factors Impacting Sophomores’ Satisfaction and Behavioral Intention to Use Online Learning: A Case Study of a Public University in Yunnan, China. AU-GSB E-JOURNAL, 18(1), 140-148. https://doi.org/10.14456/augsbejr.2025.14
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Zhiyun Li

Ph.D. Candidate in Technology, Education and Management, Graduate School of Business and Advanced Technology Management Assumption University of Thailand.

References

Abbas, T. (2016). Social factors affecting students’ acceptance of e-learning environments in developing and developed countries: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 7(2), 200-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhtt-11-2015-0042

Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkerberg, D., & Hollingsworth, T. D. (2020). How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet, 395(10228), 931-934. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30567-5

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909. 107. 2. 238

Cao, M., Zhang, Q., & Seydel, J. (2005). B2C e-commerce web site quality: An empirical examination. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(5), 645-661. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570510600000

Chang, C.-C. (2013). Library mobile applications in university libraries. Library Hi Tech, 31(3), 478-492. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-03-2013-0024

Cheng, Y.-M. (2012). Effects of quality antecedents on e-learning acceptance. Internet Research, 22(3), 361-390. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211235699

Cheng, Y.-M. (2014). Extending the expectation confirmation model with quality and flow to explore nurses continued blended e-learning intention. Information Technology & People, 27(3), 230-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-01-2013-0024

Cheng, Y.-M. (2020). Students’ satisfaction and continuance intention of the cloud-based e-learning system: roles of interactivity and course quality factors. Education þ Training, 62(9), 1037-1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-10-2019-0245

Cheng, Y.-M. (2021). Can tasks and learning be balanced? A dual-pathway model of cloud-based e-learning continuance intention and performance outcomes. Kybernetes, 51(1), 210-240. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2020-0440

Chien, T.-C., & Georgia, S. (2012). Computer self-efficacy and factors influencing e-learning effectiveness. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 670-686. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255539

Chopra, G., Madan, P., Jaisingh, P., & Bhaskar, P. (2019). Effectiveness of e-learning portal from students' perspective: A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(2), 94-116. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-05-2018-0027

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Elliot, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student Satisfaction: An Alternative Approach to Assessing This Important Concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24, 197-209.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080022000013518

Ellyana Dwi, D., Redy, A., & Hamzah, A. (2009). Variabel Anteseden dan Konsekuensi Pemanfaatan Sistem Informasi (Studi Kasus pada Pemerintahan Kabupaten Madura). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 6(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2009.04

Fan, X., Duangekanong, S., & Xu, M. (2021). Factors Affecting College Students’ Intention to Use English U-learning in Sichuan, China. AU-GSB E-JOURNAL, 14(2), 118-129. https://doi.org/10.14456/augsbejr.2021.20

Fokides, E. (2017). Greek Pre-service Teachers’ Intentions to Use Computers as In-service Teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 8(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6187

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Gaurav, C., Pankaj, M., Piyush, J., & Preeti, B. (2019). Effectiveness of e-learning portal from students’ perspective A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(2), 94-116.

Hair, J. F., Babin, A., Money, A., & Samouel, P. (2003). Essentials of business research methods (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(3), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310361240

Islam, A. N. (2012). Toward an e-learning system. Adoption of Virtual Technologies for Business, Educational, and Governmental Advancements (1st ed.). IGI Global.

Jahmani, K., Fadiya, S., Abubakar, A., & Elrehail, H. (2018). Knowledge content quality, perceived usefulness, KMS use for sharing and retrieval A flock leadership application. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48(4), 470-490. https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-08-2017-0054

Kao, R.-H., & Lin, C.-T. (2018). The usage intention of e-learning for police education and training. Policing: An International Journal, 41(1), 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-10-2016-0157

Lee, Y.-C. (2006). An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system. Online Information Review, 30(5), 517-541. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520610706406

Lin, W. S., & Wang, C. H. (2012). Antecedence to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: a contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit. Computers and Education, 58(1), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008

Lu, H.-P., & Yang, Y. W. (2014). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a social networking site: an extension of task-technology fit to social-technology fit. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.020

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.) McGraw.

Rughoobur-Seetah, S. (2021). An evaluation of the impact of confinement on the quality of e-learning in higher education institutions Quality Assurance in Education (1st ed.). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Saeed, K. A., Hwang, Y., & Yi, M. Y. (2003). Toward an integrative framework for online consumer behavior research: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 15(4), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2003100101

Salimon, M., Mokhtar, M., Aliyu, A., & Perumal, S. (2021). Solving e-learning adoption intention puzzles among private universities in Nigeria: an empirical approach. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(3), 613-631. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-11-2020-0410

Samsudeen, S., & Mohamed, R. (2019). University students' intention to use e-learning systems: A study of higher educational institutions in Sri Lanka. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(3), 219-238.

Sener, J. (2010). Why online education will attain full scale. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 14(14), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v14i4.152

Sharma, G. P., Verma, R. C., & Pathare, P. (2005). Mathematical modeling of infrared radiation thin layer drying of onion slices. Journal of Food Engineering, 71(3), 282–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.02.010

Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). The Italian versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory-II: Psychometric properties and discriminant power. In M.A. Lange (Ed.), Leading - Edge psychological tests and testing research (pp. 27-50). Nova Science Publishers.

Straub, D. W. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 147– 169. https://doi.org/10.2307/248922

Sun, P., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

Tan, X., & Kim, A. (2015). User acceptance of SaaS-based collaboration tools: a case of Google Docs. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-04-2014-0039

Teo, T. S. H., & Men, B. (2008). Knowledge portals in Chinese consulting firms: a task–technology fit perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(6), 557-574. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.41

Theresiawati, T., Seta, H. B., Hidayanto, A. N., & Abidin, Z. (2020). Variables affecting e-learning services quality in Indonesian higher education: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Information Technology Education, Research, 19, 259-286. https://doi.org/10.28945/4489.

Tu, Y.-F., Hwang, G.-J., Joyce, C.-C., & Lai, C. (2021). University students’ attitudes towards ubiquitous library supported learning: an empirical investigation in the context of the Line@Library. The Electronic Library, 39(1), 186-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-03-2020-0076

Uppal, M. A., Ali, S., & Gulliver, S. R. (2018). Factors determining e‐learning service quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 412-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12552

Vululleh, P. (2018). Determinants of Students’ E-Learning Acceptance in Developing Countries: An Approach Based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 14(1), 141-151.

Wang, C., Xie, A., Wang, W., & Wu, H. (2020). Association between medical students’ prior experiences and perceptions of formal online education developed in response to COVID- 19: A cross-sectional study in China. BMJ Journals, 10(10), e041886. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041886

Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. (1997). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/270754.

Wu, J. H., & Wang, Y. M. (2006). Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s model. Information and Management, 43(6), 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002

Xu, F., Tian, M., & Xu, A. (2017). Understanding Chinese users’ switching behaviour of cloud storage services. The Electronic Library, 35(2), 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-04-2016-0080

Zhou, T. (2011). Understanding online community user participation: a social influence perspective. Internet Research, 21(1), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111104884