An Exploration of Cognition and Personality Through the Lens of Cognitive Style
Keywords:
Incremental/radical Creativity, Personality, Linear/nonlinear CognitionAbstract
This study reappraises cognitive style at the intersection of cognitive development and personality. Traditionally conceptualised as a bipolar continuum contrasting significantly different modes of information processing, cognitive style has often been aligned with personality traits ranging from conscientiousness to openness. Our review, supported by correlational evidence, challenges this duality. Results show that openness is positively associated with nonlinear thinking, while conscientiousness is potentially unrelated to linearity, the latter is related to psychological climate. Moreover, linear and nonlinear measures are positively correlated, suggesting additive rather than opposing processes. When considering Kirton’s cognitive style bipolar framework, originality is aligned with both nonlinearity and openness, while linearity is unrelated to conformity. Drawing on Piaget’s theory, we distinguish the concrete stage, which supports learned, socially adaptive, and linear behaviour, from the formal stage, which enables additively both linear reasoning and nonlinear abstraction. Because fewer than half of adults reach formal cognition, many remain limited to linear thought. A similar position exists with the bipolar configuration, where a normal distribution shows half of the population limited to adaptive (linear) reasoning. These findings indicate that linearity relates to a socially shaped mode of information processing, whereas nonlinearity corresponds with, or is even replaced by, openness. This reconceptualization highlights how education’s emphasis on linear learning may constrain problem-solving, leadership, and the developmental potential of an individual.
References
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967.
Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280
Berlow, E., Canon, S., DeBiswas, K., Gurman, D., Jacoby, S., Simmons, L., Walshe, A., Williams, R., Yuan, T., & Runco, M. (2021). Creative Diversity: Patterns in the Creative Habits of 10,000 People. Cornell University. Retrieved from.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.1275
Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 664-678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01456.x
Bratianu, C., & Vasilache, S. (2009). Evaluating linear-nonlinear thinking style for knowledge management education. Management & Marketing, 4(3), 3-18.
Brown, H. D. (Ed.). (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Burkert, M., & Grossrieder, S. (2025). Individual ambidexterity and management controls: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00493-w
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 3-25.
Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. Addison-Wesley.
Clapp, R. G., & Ruckthum, V. (2017). An Evaluation of the Relationships between Psychological Climate and the Styles of Cognitive Preference and Manifest Ideas. ABAC ODI JOURNAL Vision. Action. Outcome, 4(2), 71.
https://assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/odijournal/article/view/2688
Clapp, R. G., & Ruckthum, V. (2023). An exploration of creative problem-solving through a stylistic lens. ABAC ODI Journal Vision. Action. Outcome, 10(2), 510-539. http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/odijournal
Clapp, R. G. (1991). The fate of ideas that aim to stimulate change in a large organisation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Council for National Academic Awards.
Clapp, R. G. (1993). Stability of cognitive style in adults and some implications: A longitudinal study of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Psychological Reports, 73, 1235-1245.
Clapp, R. G., & de Ciantis, S. M. (1989). Adaption-Innovation in large organizations: Does cognitive style characterize actual behaviour of employees at work? An exploratory study. Psychological Reports, 65(2), 503-513.
Clements, L., Redding, E., Lefebvre Sell, N., & May, J. (2018). Expertise in evaluating choreographic creativity: An online variation of the consensual assessment technique. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01448
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
De Young, C. G. (2014). Cybernetic Big Five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004
Drucker, P. F. (1969). Management’s new role. Harvard Business Review, 47(6), 49-54.
Foxall, G. R. (2014). Cognitive requirements of competing neuro-behavioural decision systems: Some implications of temporal horizon for managerial behaviour in organizations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00370
Gelade, G. A. (2002). Creative style, personality, and artistic endeavor. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 129(3), 213-234.
Gilson, L. L., & Madjar, N. (2010). Radical and incremental creativity: Antecedents and processes.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 21-28.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017863
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
Hogan, J., Murdock, K., Hamill, M., Lanzara, A., & Winner, E. (2018). Looking at the process: Examining creative and artistic thinking in fashion designers on a reality television show. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02008
Huitt, W., & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Educational Psychology Interactive, 3(2), 1-5.
Jones, A. P., & James, L. R. (1979). Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 201-250.
Jung, C. G. (1923). Psychological types. Harcourt Brace.
Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Opening up Openness to Experience: A four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.33
Kazi, S., & Galanaki, E. (2020). Piagetian theory of cognitive development. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171492.wecad364
Kelly, G. A. (1963). Theory of personality (Vol. 1). Norton.
Kirton, M. J. (1961). Management initiative. Acton Society Trust.
Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622-629. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
Kirton, M. J. (2011). Adaption-innovation in the context of diversity and change. Routledge.
Kuhn, D., Langer, J., Kohlberg, L., & Haan, N. S. (1977). The development of formal operations in logical and moral judgment. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 95, 97-188.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (4th ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Lewin, R. (1952). Field theory of Social Science. Tavistock.
Litwin, G., & Stringer, R. (1968). Motivation and Organisational Climate. Harvard University Press.
MacDonald, K. (1998). Evolution, culture, and the five-factor model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 119-149.
Malik, M. A., Choi, J. N., & Butt, A. N. (2019). Distinct effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic rewards on radical and incremental creativity: The moderating role of goal orientations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(9), 1013-1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2403
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 57, 17-40.
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hrebickova, M., & Avia, M. D. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 173-186.
Meynhardt, T., Hermann, C., & Anderer, S. (2017). Making sense of the most popular metaphor in management: Towards a HedgeFox scale for cognitive styles. Administrative Sciences, 7(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7030033
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge.
Reiter-Palmon, R., Illies, J. J., & Kobe-Cross, L. M. (2009). Conscientiousness is not always a good predictor of performance: The case of creativity. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 19(2), 27-45.
Robbins, T. W., & Cools, R. (2014). Cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Movement Disorders, 29(5), 597-607.
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The Big Five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 789-801.
Salton, G. J. (1996). Organizational engineering: A new method of creating high-performance human structures. Professional Communications Press.
Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28, 447-479.
Schneider, B. (1987). People make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
Shao, Y., Zhang, C., Zhou, J., Gu, T., & Yuan, Y. (2019). How does culture shape creativity? A mini-review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01219
Stacey, R. D. (1995). The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 477-495.
Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know?. Princeton University Press.
Tetlock, P. E. (2017). Expert political judgment. Princeton University Press.
Thibodeau, P. H., Frantz, C. M., & Stroink, M. L. (2016). Situating a measure of systems thinking in a landscape of psychological constructs: Systems mindset. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33(6), 753-769. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2388
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225-251.
Van der Molen, P. P. (1994). Adaption-innovation and changes in social structure: On the anatomy of catastrophe. In M. J. Kirton (Ed.), Adaptors and innovators: Styles of creativity and problem-solving (pp. 206-218). International Thomson Press.
Varnum, M. E. W., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2009). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: The social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359301
Von Wittich, D., & Antonakis, J. (2011). The KAI cognitive style inventory: Was it personality all along?. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 1044-1049.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Problems of the theory and history of psychology. Springer Science & Business Media.
Watts, W. (1985). Relationship between specific skills and managerial performance. MPhil Thesis, North East London Polytechnic.
Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105(2), 230-250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.230
Yilmaz, S. (2020). The ambidextrous personality and situation: A trait interaction approach to ambidexterity, radical and incremental creativity [Master’s thesis]. Erasmus University.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151-175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zohar, D. (2014). Safety climate: Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement. In B. Schneider & K. M. Barbera (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture (pp. 317-334). Oxford University Press.
