ChatGPT for English Writing: A Qualitative Inquiry among English Major Students at Thai Higher Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
The academic discourse surrounding the use of ChatGPT has grown, yet research focusing on its application among Thai English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students remains limited. Addressing this gap, this qualitative study explores the attitudes and perceptions of seven fourth-year English majors from a university in Southern Thailand regarding ChatGPT's roles in English writing. Using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, the study uncovers a range of student attitudes, highlighting both the advantages and challenges of using ChatGPT. Participants recognized the tool's utility in enhancing vocabulary, grammar, and content organization, as well as its accessibility and convenience. Nonetheless, they also expressed concerns about its limitations, such as the risks of plagiarism, inaccuracies in generated content, over-reliance on the tool, and diminished cognitive engagement and creativity. These findings draw our attention to the importance of balancing the benefits of AI-assisted learning with strategies to mitigate its drawbacks. The study advocates for educators to harness ChatGPT's potential while fostering critical thinking, ethical awareness, and technological literacy among students. Moreover, it calls for a global dialogue on the pedagogical and ethical dimensions of AI in education to ensure that future learners become proficient and responsible users of emerging technologies.
Article Details
References
Adıgüzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep429. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152
Ahn, Y. Y. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT 3.5 on CSAT: Its potential as a language learning and assessment tool. Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 22(2), 119-145. http://doi.org/10.18649/jkees.2023.22.2.119
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Al-Qaysi, N., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Iranmanesh, M., Ahmad, A., & Mahmoud, M. A. (2024). Determinants of ChatGPT use and its impact on learning performance: An integrated model of BRT and TPB. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1-13.
Apridayani, A., Han, W., & Sakkanayok, K. (2024). Enhancing English writing competence in higher education: A comparative study of teacher-only assessment versus teacher and student self-assessment approaches. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862‐024‐00263‐3
Apridayani, A., Yungkun, N., Thoch, K., & Rukthong, A. (2021). Writing strategies for argumentative essay and short research reports: The case of Thai EFL learners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(1), 300-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.1.21.300
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Belda-Medina, J., & Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2022). Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8427. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178427
Bibi, Z., & Atta, A. (2024). The role of ChatGPT as AI English writing assistant: A study of student’s perceptions, experiences, and satisfaction. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(1), 433-443. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-I)39
Bok, E., & Cho, Y. (2023). Examining Korean EFL college students’ experiences and perceptions of using ChatGPT as a writing revision tool. Journal of English Teaching through Movies and Media, 24(4), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2023.24.4.15
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Terry, G. (2015). Thematic analysis. In P. Rohleder, & A. Lyons (Eds), Qualitative research in clinical and health psychology (pp. 95–113). Palgrave MacMillan.
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). An expectancy value theory (EVT) based instrument for measuring student perceptions of generative AI. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 64.
Chiu, T. K., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2023). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132.
Eke, D. O. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity?. Journal of Responsible Technology, 13, 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060
Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22
Fryer, L. K., Ainley, M., Thompson, A., Gibson, A., & Sherlock, Z. (2017). Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of chatbot and human task partners. Computers in human behavior, 75, 461-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.045
Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage Publications.
Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13(7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692
Greller, W., & Drachsler, H. (2012). Translating learning into numbers: A generic framework for learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 42-57. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/jeductechsoci.15.3.42
Guo, K., Wang, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 54, 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666
Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036
Hong, W. C. H. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on foreign language teaching and learning: Opportunities in education and research. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 5(1), 37-45. https://jeti.thewsu.org/index.php/cieti/article/view/103/64
Horton, J., Macve, R., & Struyven, G. (2004). Qualitative research: Experiences in using semi-structured interviews. In C. Humphrey & B. Lee (Eds.), The real life guide to accounting research (pp. 339-357). Elsevier.
Hu, G. W., & Chen, B. (2007). A protocol-based study of university level Chinese EFL learners’ writing strategies. English Australia Journal, 23(2), 37-56.
Huang, W., Hew, K. F., & Fryer, L. K. (2022). Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot‐supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12610
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Imran, M., & Almusharraf, N. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level: A systematic review of the literature. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep464. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13605
Jo, H. (2023). Decoding the ChatGPT mystery: A comprehensive exploration of factors driving AI language model adoption. Information Development, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669231202764
Kim, J. H. (2015). Understanding narrative inquiry: The crafting and analysis of stories as research. Sage Publications.
Kim, S., Shim, J., & Shim, J. (2023). A study on the utilization of OpenAI ChatGPT as a second language learning tool. Journal of Multimedia Information System, 10(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.33851/JMIS.2023.10.1.79
Kohnke, L. (2022). A qualitative exploration of student perspectives of chatbot use during emergency remote teaching. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 16(4), 475-488. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2022.125966
Kohnke, L. (2023). A pedagogical chatbot: A supplemental language learning tool. RELC Journal, 54(3), 828-838. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211067054
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537-550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. TESL-EJ, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int
Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973-1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3
Kusters, R., Misevic, D., Berry, H., Cully, A., Le Cunff, Y., Dandoy, L., & Wehbi, F. (2020). Interdisciplinary research in artificial intelligence: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Big Data, 3, 577974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2020.577974
Lee, J., Cerreto, F. A., & Lee, J. (2010). Theory of planned behavior and teachers' decisions regarding use of educational technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 152-164.
Lee, C., Panda, P., Srinivasan, G., & Roy, K. (2018). Training deep spiking convolutional neural networks with stdp-based unsupervised pre-training followed by supervised fine-tuning. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 435. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00435
Lin, M. P. C., & Chang, D. (2020). Enhancing post-secondary writers’ writing skills with a chatbot. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 78-92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915408
Liu, B. (2023). Chinese university students’ attitudes and perceptions in learning English using ChatGPT. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 3(2), 132-140.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Ma, F. (2015). A review of research methods in EFL education. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(3), 566. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0503.16
Nguyen, T. T. H. (2021). Implementing digital techniques to stimulate EFL students’ engagement: A case study in Vietnam. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 105-129. https://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/81
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to academic writing. Longman.
Park, H.-Y. (2023). Application of ChatGPT for an English learning platform. Journal of English Teaching through Movies and Media, 24(3), 30-48. https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2023.24.3.30
Rosenzweig, E. Q., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2019). Expectancy-value theory and its relevance for student motivation and learning. In K. A. Renninger & S. E. Hidi (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning (pp. 617–644). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823279.026
Sadaf, A., & Johnson, B. L. (2017). Teachers' beliefs about integrating digital literacy into classroom practice: An investigation based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(4), 129-137.
Shin, D. (2023). Utilizing ChatGPT in guided writing activities. Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 22(2), 197-217. https://doi.org/10.18649/jkees.2023.22.2.197
Smutny, P., & Schreiberova, P. (2020). Chatbots for learning: A review of educational chatbots for the Facebook Messenger. Computers & Education, 151, 103862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103862
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-14.
Taecharungroj, V. (2023). What can ChatGPT do? Analyzing early reactions to the innovative AI chatbot on Twitter. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010035
Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313-313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
Tica, L., & Krsmanović, I. (2024). Overcoming the writer’s block? Exploring students’ motivation and perspectives on using ChatGPT as a writing assistance tool in ESP. ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 21(1), 129-149.
Ulla, M. B., Perales, W. F., & Busbus, S. O. (2023). ‘To generate or stop generating response’: Exploring EFL teachers’ perspectives on ChatGPT in English language teaching in Thailand. Learning: Research and Practice, 9(2), 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2023.2257252
Waluyo, B., & Apridayani, A. (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices on the use of video in English language teaching. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 726-744. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19214
Waluyo, B., & Apridayani, A. (2024). Better learning and practice with teacher corrective feedback in higher education: A lesson from Thailand. Learning: Research and Practice, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2024.2357552
Waluyo, B., & Kusumastuti, S. (2024). Generative AI in student English learning in Thai higher education: More engagement, better outcomes?. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101146
Wang, E. L., Matsumura, L. C., Correnti, R., Litman, D., Zhang, H., Howe, E., Magooda, A., & Quintana, R. (2020). eRevis (ing): Students’ revision of text evidence use in an automated writing evaluation system. Assessing Writing, 44, 100449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100449
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K. F, Lee, M., Temitayo I., Dai, Y., & Chai, C. S. (2022). A self-determination theory design approach for inclusive and diverse artificial intelligence (AI) K-12 education. Computers & Education, 189, 104582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104582
Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023). An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages, 8(3), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212
Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
Yanning, D. (2017). Teaching and assessing critical thinking in second language writing: An infusion approach. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 431-451. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2017-0025
Zou, M., & Huang, L. (2023). To use or not to use? Understanding doctoral students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in writing through technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1-9.