Influences on Student Satisfaction with School Teaching: Insights from a College in Shandong Province
Keywords:
Student Satisfaction, Instructor Quality, Course Structure, Teacher Feedback Quality, Education QualityAbstract
Purpose: The study investigates the influence of five independent variables (Instructor Quality, Course Structure, Campus Life and Social Integration, Teacher Feedback Quality, and Education Quality) on one dependent variable (Student Satisfaction). Additionally, it aims to identify significant differences between variables. Research design, data, and methodology: The research employed the Index of Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) for validity and a Cronbach's Alpha in a pilot test (n=50) for reliability. 238 valid responses from students in a College, Shandong Province, were analyzed by multiple linear regression to verify the significant relationship between variables. Following this, 30 students underwent an 18-week Intervention Strategic Plan (SP). Afterward, the quantitative results from post-SP and pre-SP were analyzed in the paired-sample t-test for comparison. Results: In multiple linear regression, the study revealed that Campus Life and Social Integration, Teacher Feedback Quality, and Education Quality impacted student satisfaction, while (Instructor Quality and Course Structure had no significant impact on student satisfaction. Finally, the results from the paired-sample t-test for comparison demonstrated a significant difference in student satisfaction between the post-SP and pre-SP stages. Conclusions: This research aims to improve students' satisfaction with the school at LYT College, Shandong Province, China.
References
Abbas, J. (2020). Service quality in higher education institutions: Qualitative evidence from the students’ perspectives using Maslow hierarchy of needs. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 12(3), 371-384. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqss-02-2020-0016
Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., & Ziegelmayer, J. L. (2017). Cumulative learning and sustained engagement in an introduction to accounting course. Asian Review of Accounting, 26(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-03-2017-0036
Ali, M., Piah, C. H., Hashmi, A., & Ashfaq, M. (2022). Student e-learning service quality, satisfaction, commitment, and behavior towards finance courses in COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(6), 892-907. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-04-2021-0133
Alquraan, M. F. (2012). Methods of assessing students’ learning in higher education: An analysis of Jordanian college and grading system. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 5(2), 124-133. https://doi.org/10.1108/17537981211251160
Arezes, P. M., & Swuste, P. (2013). The emergence of (post) academic courses in occupational safety and health: The example of Portugal. Industrial and Commercial Training, 45(3), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197851311320595
Arghode, V., Brieger, E., & Wang, J. (2018). Engaging instructional design and instructor role in online learning environments. European Journal of Training and Development, 42(7/8), 366-380. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-12-2017-0110
Badri, S. K. Z. (2020). Study-life integration and young adult students’ mental health. Journal of Public Mental Health, 20(1), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-06-2019-0069
Burkhardt, J., & Bennett, E. E. (2015). Shaping the future of a globalized world: A qualitative study of how undergraduate international students’ everyday cross-cultural experiences were impacted by university diversity initiatives. European Journal of Training and Development, 39(3), 162-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-06-2014-0042
Candra, S., & Jeselin, F. S. (2022). Students’ perspectives on using e-learning applications and technology during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesian higher education. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 2(3), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-12-2021-0185
Cheng, Y. M. (2013). Extending the expectation-confirmation model with quality and flow to explore nurses continued blended e-learning intention. Information Technology & People, 27(3), 230-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-01-2013-0024
Chien, T. K. (2007). Using the learning satisfaction improving model to enhance the teaching quality. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(2), 192-214. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880710748947
Daultani, Y., Goswami, M., Kumar, A., & Pratap, S. (2021). Perceived outcomes of e-learning: Identifying key attributes affecting user satisfaction in higher education institutes. Measuring Business Excellence, 25(2), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-07-2020-0110
Davidovitch, N. (2007). Pedagogy and technology – Which has the upper hand? Lessons from technological implementation at the College of Judea and Samaria, Israel. On the Horizon, 15(3), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120710825068
Dobbelaer, M. J., Prins, F., & Dongen, D. V. (2012). The impact of feedback training for inspectors. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(1), 86-104.
Drago, W., & Peltier, J. (2004). The effects of class size on effectiveness of online courses. The Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 27(10), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784310
Faisal, N., Nurhafni Murdiana, P., & Zulhilmi, A. (2017). Policy of educational budget Aceh regency. Emerald Reach Proceedings Series, 1, 423-428. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-793-1-00035
Felce, A. (2019). Managing the quality of higher education in apprenticeships. Higher Education, Skills, and Work-Based Learning, 9(2), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-10-2018-0106
Gbettor, E. M. A., Mensah, C., & Abiemo, M. K. (2022). Self-efficacy and academic programme satisfaction: Mediating effect of meaningfulness of study. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(3), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-09-2021-0353
Gupta, S., & Priyanka, P. (2022). Gamification and e-learning adoption: A sequential mediation analysis of flow and engagement. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 3(4), 45-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-04-2022-0131
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Haverila, M., & Haverila, K. C. (2021). The impact of the student–instructor relationship on student-centric measures. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(1), 240-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-12-2020-0435
Kieng, R., Phothokitti, K., & Vongurai, R. (2021). Critical factors affecting student satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical study in Cambodia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(7), 0225-0234.
Kim, S., Lee, J., Yoon, S. H., & Kim, H. W. (2022). How can we achieve better e-Learning success in the new normal? Internet Research, 33(1), 410-441. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-05-2021-0310
Martirosyan, N. (2014). An examination of factors contributing to student satisfaction in Armenian higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(2), 177-191.
Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., Baharom, M. N. R., & Harun, H. (2014). Factors influencing the satisfaction of international postgraduate students in the Malaysian context—A literature review and a proposed model. International Education Studies, 7(11), 76-83. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n11p76
Menkhoff, T., Yian, T. T., Wah, C. Y., & Kee, W. Y. (2011). VINE: The journal of information and knowledge management systems, 41(2), 132-151.
Mishchenko, E. D. (2013). Towards inclusive campus environments: Evidence-based research of a university campus. Towards Inclusive Campus Environments, 38(1), 31-42.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ohi-01-2013-b0004
Mishra, A., Jha, S., & Nargundkar, R. (2020). The role of instructor experiential values in shaping students’ course experiences, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(6), 898-915. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-11-2019-2645
Negm, E. M. (2023). A student’s satisfaction model for an executive education blended learning approach, considering aspects for marketing applications. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 13(6), 1286-1304. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-12-2022-0281
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Olivier, C., & Burton, C. (2020). A large-group peer mentoring programme in an under-resourced higher education environment. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(4), 341-356. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-07-2019-0074
Rogers, J., & Smith, M. (2011). Demonstrating genuine interest in students’ needs and progress: Implications for student satisfaction with courses. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 3(1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/17581181111150865
Tam, W. M., & Cheng, Y. C. (1996). Staff development for school education quality: Implications of multimodels. Training for Quality, 4(4), 16-24.
Tan, C. Y., Abdullah, A. G. K., & Ali, A. J. (2018). The effects of soft skill integration on quality of college life of diploma business students: Evidence from Malaysian private higher education. Journal of International Education in Business, 12(2), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-03-2018-0011
Varela, O. E., Cater, J. J., & Michel, N. (2014). Learner-instructor similarity: A social attribution approach to learning. Journal of Management Development, 34(4), 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-08-2013-0102
Watty, K. (2006). Quality in accounting education: What say the academics? Quality Assurance in Education, 13(2), 120-131. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880510594373
Wong, B. T. M. (2021). A survey on the pedagogical features of language massive open online courses. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 16(1), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-03-2021-0028
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Xiang Hui

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submitting author warrants that the submission is original and that she/he is the author of the submission together with the named co-authors; to the extend the submission incorporates text passages, figures, data, or other material from the work of others, the submitting author has obtained any necessary permission.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY What does this mean?). This is to get more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for you, the authors.

