Exploring Interactive Pedagogy to Enhance Students’ Engagement in ECE in Southwest China

Authors

  • Lu Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/shserj.2025.37
CITATION
DOI: 10.14456/shserj.2025.37
Published: 2025-06-24

Keywords:

Learner-Content Interaction, Learner-Instructor Interaction, Learner-Learner Interaction, Students’ Emotional, Behavioural and Cognitive Engagement, Early Childhood Education

Abstract

Purpose: This study is to verify the significance between learner-content interaction, learner-instructor interaction, learner-learner interaction and students’ emotional, behavioural, and cognitive engagement in class. Research design, data and methodology: Index of Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) rating and a pilot test (n=30) were used for validity and reliability. 280 responses from ECE in an application-oriented private university in southwest China were analyzed by the multiple linear regression (MLR) to verify the significant relationship between variables and 6 teachers and 12 students were interviewed for offering suggestions to intervention process. Following this, a group of 40 students underwent a 12-week Intervention Design and Implementation (IDI). Afterwards, the results were compared using paired samples t-test before and after the intervention and the same 6 students were interviewed for feedback. Results: The results of MLR revealed that there were significant influences between learner-content interaction, learner-learner interaction and students’ emotional, behavioural and cognitive engagement, but not learner-instructor interaction. In addition, paired samples t-test results indicated significant changes in learner-content interaction, learner-learner interaction, and students' emotional, behavioural and cognitive engagement before and after the intervention. Conclusions: Although benefits and challenges coexist, interactive pedagogy is worth promoting as it enhances students’ learning effectiveness, emotional experiences, and overall development.

Author Biography

Lu Zhang

Assumption University.

References

Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255-264.

Alaidi, A., Yahya, O., & Alrikabi, H. (2020). Using modern education technique in Wasit university. International Association of Online Engineering, 14(6), 82-94.

Allen, M. W. (2016). Michael Allen's guide to e-learning: Building interactive, fun, and effective learning programs for any company. John Wiley & Sons.

Anjarwati, R., & Sa’adah, L. (2021). Student learning engagement in the online class. English Journal of Merdeka: Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 6(2), 104-114.

Argyris, C. (1970). Intervention Theory & Method: A Behavioural Science View. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Astin, A. W. (1999). “Involvement in Learning” Revisited: Lessons We Have Learned. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 587-98.

Banna, J., Lin, M.-F. G., Stewart, M., & Fialkowski, M. K. (2015). Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 249-261.

Beck, V. S. (2010). Comparing online and face-to-face teaching and learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 21(3), 95-108.

Benic, M. Z., & Jambresic, I. (2020). Is There a Need for Handicraft in Preschool? Attitudes of Preschool Teachers and Parents on Including Handicraft Activities in the Regular Preschool Program. INTED2020 Proceedings, 1511-1519).

Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. Cambridge University Press.

Böheim, R., Schnitzler, K., Gröschner, A., Weil, M., Knogler, M., Schindler, A. K., & Seidel, T. (2021). Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 100450.

Brandt, W. C. (2020). Measuring Student Success Skills: A Review of the Literature on Self-Directed Learning. National Centre for the Improvement of Educational Assessment.

Catalano, G. D., & Catalano, K. (1999). Transformation: From teacher‐centred to student‐centred engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(1), 59-64.

Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121-141.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H. (2004). Intergenerational bonding in school: The behavioural and contextual correlates of student-teacher relationships. Sociology of Education, 77(1), 60-81.

Dixson, M. D. (2012). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging?. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1-13.

Elizondo-Garcia, J., & Gallardo, K. (2020). Peer Feedback in Learner Learner Interaction Practices. Mixed Methods Study on an xMOOC. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(2), 122-135.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.

Fung, D., & Liang, T. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative mind mapping in Hong Kong primary science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(3), 899-922.

Gnusowski, M., & Schoefer, K. (2022). Student-to-Student Interactions in Marketing Education: A Critical Incident Technique-Based Inquiry Into Drivers of Students’(Dis) Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 44(1), 25-40.

Gregory, A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Hafen, C. A., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Effects of a professional development program on behavioural engagement of students in middle and high school. Psychology in the Schools, 51(2), 143-163.

Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Strycker, L. A., & Dennis, C. (2021). Measuring Explicit Instruction Using Classroom Observations of Student–Teacher Interactions (COSTI). Perspectives on Behaviour Science, 44(2), 267-283.

Han, K. (2021). Fostering students' autonomy and engagement in EFL classroom through proximal classroom factors: autonomy-supportive behaviours and student-teacher relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 767079.

Hartikainen, J., Poikkeus, A. M., Haapala, E. A., Sääkslahti, A., & Finni, T. (2021). Associations of Classroom Design and Classroom-Based Physical Activity with Behavioural and Emotional Engagement among Primary School Students. Sustainability, 13(14), 8116.

Huang, B., Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2019). Investigating the effects of gamification-enhanced flipped learning on undergraduate students’ behavioural and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1106-1126.

Ifinedo, P., & Usoro, A. (2016). Students' intentions to continue using blogs to learn: A sociocognitive-perspective. Computing and Information Systems Journal, 20(3), 1-11.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.

Kumar, P., Saxena, C., & Baber, H. (2021). Learner-content interaction in e-learning-the moderating role of perceived harm of COVID-19 in assessing the satisfaction of learners. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 1-15.

Lai, H. M., Hsieh, P. J., Uden, L., & Yang, C. H. (2021). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing university students’ behavioural engagement in flipped classrooms. Computers & Education, 175, 104318.

Lamb, S., Huo, S., Walstab, A., Wade, A., Maire, Q., Doecke, E., Jackson, J., & Endekov, Z. (2020). Educational opportunity in Australia 2020: Who succeeds and who misses out. Centre for International Research on Education Systems, Victoria University, for the Mitchell Institute: Melbourne.

Leite, L. O., Go, W., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2022). Exploring the learning process of experienced teachers focused on building positive interactions with pupils. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(1), 28-42.

Luo, N., Li, H., Zhao, L., Wu, Z., & Zhang, J. (2022). Promoting student engagement in online learning through harmonious classroom environment. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(5), 541-551.

Lutz, M. E., & Culver, S. (2010). The national survey of student engagement: A university‐level analysis. Tertiary Education and Management, 16(1), 35-44.

Manzoor, A., Aziz, H., Jahanzaib, M., Wasim, A., & Hussain, S. (2017). Transformational model for engineering education from content-based to outcome-based education. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 27(4), 266-286.

Martin, D. P., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2015). Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math?. Journal of school psychology, 53(5), 359-373.

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222.

Miao, J., Chang, J., & Ma, L. (2022). Teacher–Student Interaction, Student–Student Interaction and Social Presence: Their Impacts on Learning Engagement in Online Learning Environments. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 183(6), 514-526.

Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic China. (2011, July 29). Outline of the National Medium- and Long-Term Education Reform and Development Plan (2010-2010). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A01/s7048/201007/t20100729_171904.html

Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123(4), 41-52.

Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2021). Introduction to linear regression analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7.

Muir, T., Wang, I., Trimble, A., Mainsbridge, C., & Douglas, T. (2022). Using interactive online pedagogical approaches to promote student engagement. Education Sciences, 12(6), 415.

Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Impact of Active Learning Strategy on the Student Engagement. GNOSI: an interdisciplinary journal of human theory and praxis, 4(2), 96-114.

Nabievna, A. O. (2023). Role Play as a Way of Displaying the World in Preschool Age. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 4(2), 42-48.

Naibert, N., Vaughan, E. B., Brevick, K., & Barbera, J. (2022). Exploring Student Perceptions of Behavioural, Cognitive, and Emotional Engagement at the Activity Level in General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(3), 1358-1367.

Niemi, K. (2021). ‘The best guess for the future?’ Teachers’ adaptation to open and flexible learning environments in Finland. Education Inquiry, 12(3), 282-300.

Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and instruction, 1(2), 117-175.

Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., Panigrahi, P. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Role of internet self-efficacy and interactions on blended learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 62(6), 1239-1252.

Pfaff, E., & Huddleston, P. (2003). Does it matter if I hate team- work? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(1), 37-45.

Piamsai, C. (2020). The effect of scaffolding on non-proficient EFL learners’ performance in an academic writing class. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(2), 288-305.

Pilotti, M., Anderson, S., Hardy, P., Murphy, P., & Vincent, P. (2017). Factors related to cognitive, emotional, and behavioural engagement in the online asynchronous classroom. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 145-153.

Powers, K., Shin, S. H., Hagans, K. S., & Cordova, M. (2015). The impact of a teacher professional development program on student engagement. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 3(4), 231-240.

Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self-efficacy: Flow-on effects for online learning behaviour. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91-97.

Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. Springer.

Reschly, A. L., Pohl, A. J., & Christenson, S. L. (Eds.). (2020). Student engagement: Effective academic, behavioural, cognitive, and affective interventions at school. Springer.

Ross, A., & Willson, V. L. (2017). Paired samples T-test. Brill.

Rovinelli, R. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1976). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Journal of Educational Measurement, 13(2), 161-175.

Sagayadevan, V., & Jeyaraj, S. (2012). The role of Emotional Engagement in Lecturer-Student interaction and the Impact on Academic Outcomes of Student Achievement and Learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 1-30.

Sanders, M. J. (2013). Classroom design and student engagement. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 57(1), 496-500.

Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 102-120.

Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2022). Effects of using mobile instant messaging on student behavioural, emotional, and cognitive engagement: a quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-22.

Thach, E. C., & Murphy, K. L. (1995). Competencies for distance education professionals. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 57-79.

Tsai, C. L., Ku, H. Y., & Campbell, A. (2021). Impacts of course activities on student perceptions of engagement and learning online. Distance Education, 42(1), 106-125.

Tsai, K. C. (2017). Teacher-Student Relationships, Satisfaction, and Achievement among Art and Design College Students in Macau. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(6), 12-16.

Tuovinen, J. E. (2000). Multimedia distance education interactions. Educational Media International, 37(1), 16-24.

Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2002). Predictors of web-student performance: The role of self-efficacy and reasons for taking an online class. Computers in Human Behaviour, 18(2), 151-163.

Wang, Y., Cao, Y., Gong, S., Wang, Z., Li, N., & Ai, L. (2022). Interaction and learning engagement in online learning: The mediating roles of online learning self-efficacy and academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 94, 102128.

Xerri, M. J., Radford, K., & Shacklock, K. (2018). Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective. Higher education, 75(4), 589-605.

Xinjian, Z., Fang, T., Liyan, L., & Yirun, C. (2018). How to Cultivate Application-Oriented Undergraduates – The Growth Path of an Outstanding Graduate on E-Commerce Major. Education Quarterly Reviews, 1(2), 153-167.

Yang, P. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2014). Factors influencing classroom behavioural engagement during the first year at school. Applied Developmental Science, 18(4), 189-200.

Yogev, E., Gal, K., Karger, D., Facciotti, M. T., & Igo, M. (2018). Classifying and visualizing students' cognitive engagement in course readings. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 52, 1-10.

Zhang, Z. (2015). Undergraduate student engagement in China and the UK [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Manchester.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-24

How to Cite

Zhang, L. (2025). Exploring Interactive Pedagogy to Enhance Students’ Engagement in ECE in Southwest China. Scholar: Human Sciences, 17(2), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.14456/shserj.2025.37