An investigation on Senior Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use Tencent Meeting for Legal Course in Chengdu, China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/shserj.2023.43Keywords:
Perceived Usefulness, Social Influence, Perceived Behavioral Control, Subjective Norm, Behavioral IntentionAbstract
Purpose: This research aims to investigate senior students’ behavioral intention to use Tencent meeting for the legal course in Chengdu, China. The key variables are developed from previous literature, including perceived usefulness, attitude, social influence, perceived behavioral control, subjective norm, behavioral intention, and use behavior. Research design, data, and methodology: The target population is 500 fourth-year students at three selected universities who have experience using the Tencent platform for the law course. Probability and nonprobability are used, including judgmental, stratified random, and convenience sampling. Before the data collection, the Item Objective Congruence (IOC) Index and the pilot test (n=30) by Cronbach’s Alpha were assessed to ensure content validity and reliability. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) were used as statistical tools to confirm validity, reliability, and hypotheses testing. Results: The results show that all hypotheses are supported. Perceived usefulness significantly impacts attitude. Attitude, social influence, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norm significantly impacts behavioral intention. Furthermore, behavioral intention significantly impacts use behavior. Conclusions: Tencent meeting developers, college administrators, or practitioners should focus on improving students’ Tencent meeting use behavior. The developer of Tencent Meeting and the college’s top management should concentrate on making students’ perceptions of the app’s usefulness, social influence, and attitude.
References
Abaidoo, N., & Arkorful, V. (2014). Adoption and effective integration of ICT in teaching and learning in higher institutions in Ghana. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 411-422.
Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173-221). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Ali, M., Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., & Puah, C. H. (2018). Assessing e-learning system in higher education institutes: evidence from structural equation modelling. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(1),59-78.
Al-Mamary, Y. H., & Shamsuddin, A. (2015). Testing of The Technology Acceptance Model in Context of Yemen. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 268-273.
Al-Nahdi, T. S., Habib, S. A., Bakar, A. H. A., Bahklah, M. S., Ghazzawi, O. H., & Al-Attas, H. A. (2015). The Effect of Attitude, Dimensions of Subjective Norm, and Perceived Behavior Control, on the Intention to Purchase Real Estate in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 7(5), 121-131.
Alzeban, A. (2016). Factors influencing adoption of the international financial reporting standards (IFRS) in accounting education. Journal of International Education in Business, 9(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-10-2015-0023
Awang, Z. (2012). A Handbook on SEM Structural Equation Modelling: SEM Using AMOS Graphic (5th ed.). Universiti Teknologi Mara Kelantan.
Awwad, M. S., & Al-Majali, S. M. (2015). Electronic library services acceptance and use. The Electronic Library, 33(6),1100-1120. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-03-2014-0057
Bashir, I., & Madhavaiah, C. (2015). Consumer attitude and behavioural intention towards Internet banking adoption in India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 7(1), 67-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-02-2014-0013
Benjangjaru, B., & Vongurai, R. (2018). Behavioral Intention of Bangkokians to Adopt Mobile Payment Services by Type of Users. AU-GSB E-JOURNAL, 11(1), 34-46.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2018). Predicting students’ intention to adopt mobile learning: A combination of theory of reasoned action and technology acceptance model. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 11(2), 178-191.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2017-0004
Casey, T., & Wilson-Evered, E. (2012). Predicting uptake of technology innovations in online family dispute resolution services: an application and extension of the UTAUT. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2034-2045.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.022
Chang, S. C., & Tung, F. C. (2008). An empirical investigation of students’ behavioural intentions to use the online learning course websites. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00742.x
Chao, W., & Lou, Y.-C. (2018). Construction of core competencies for family therapists in Taiwan. Journal of Family Therapy, 40(2), 265-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12204
Chen, K. Y., & Chang, M. L. (2013). User acceptance of ‘near field communication’ mobile phone service: an investigation based on the ‘unified theory of acceptance and use of technology’ model”. The Service Industries Journal, 33(6), 609-623.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2011.622369
Cruickshank, V., & Mainsbridge, C. (2022). Pre-service teacher perceptions of teaching health education online. Health Education, 122(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-01-2021-0004
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
De Haan, E., Kannan, P. K., Verhoef, P. C., & Wiesel, T. (2018). Device switching in online purchasing: examining the strategic contingencies. Journal of Marketing, 82(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.17.0113
Deng, S., Liu, Y., & Qi, Y. (2011). An empirical study on determinants of web-based question-answer services adoption. Online Information Review, 35(5), 789-798. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521111176507
Farooq, U., Gu, J., El-Hawary, M., Asad, M., & Luo, J. (2017). An extended state convergence architecture for multilateral teleoperation systems. IEEE Access, 5(1), 2063-2079.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1st ed.). Addison-Wesley. https://doi.org/10.2307/2065853
Foltz, C. B., Schwager, P. H., & Anderson, J. E. (2008). Why users (fail to) read computer usage policies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(6), 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810883969
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Fusilier, M., & Durlabhji, S. (2005). An exploration of student internet use in India the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 22(4), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740510617539
Gable, R., & Wolf, M. (1993). Instrument Development in the Affective Domain: Measuring Attitudes and Values in Corporate and School Settings (2nd ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1400-4_1
Grenny, J., Maxfield, D., & Shimberg, A. (2008). How to have influence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(1),47-52.
Hsiao, C.-H., & Tang, K.-Y. (2014). Explaining undergraduates’ behavior intention of e-textbook adoption: Empirical assessment of five theoretical models. Library Hi Tech, 32(1), 139-163. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2013-0126
Hsu, M.-H., & Chiu, C.-M. (2004). Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behavior. Behaviour and Information Technology, 23(5), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001669969
Hu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Chinese students’ behavior intention to use mobile library apps and effects of education level and discipline. Library Hi Tech, 34(4), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-06-2016-0061
Lee, Y. C. (2006). An empirical investigation into factors influencing the adoption of an e-learning system. Online Information Review, 30(5), 517-541.
Lee, Y., Lee, J., & Lee, Z. (2006). Social influence on technology acceptance behavior: self-identity theory perspective. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 37(2), 60-75. https://doi.org/10.1145/1161345.1161355
Li, H., & Lai, V. S. (2008, August 14-17). Antecedents of behavioral intention of virtual community participation: an empirical study [Paper Presentation]. AMCIS Proceedings of the International Conference, Toronto, USA.
https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2008/326
Lindsay, R., Jackson, T., & Cooke, L. (2011). Adapted technology acceptance model for mobile policing. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 13(4), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287261111183988
Liu, I. F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers and Education, 54(2), 600-610.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009
Mytton, E., & Gale, C. (2012). Prevailing issues in legal education within management and business environments. International Journal of Law and Management, 54(4), 311-321.
Park, E. (2013). The adoption of tele-presence systems: Factors affecting intention to use tele-presence systems. Kybernetes, 42(6), 869-887. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-01-2013-0013
Pedroso, R., Zanetello, L., Guimaraes, L., Pettenon, M., Goncalves, V., Scherer, J., Kessler, F., & Pechansky, F. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the crack use relapse scale (CURS). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry, 43(3), 37-40.
Qianzhan Industrial Research Institute. (2018, March 18). China’s online education industry development status and trend analysis predicted that the market size in 2019 will exceed 380 billion, the future will present five development trends. https://bg.qianzhan.com/report/detail/459/181228- dbefcd33.html
Roni, S., Merga, M., & Morris, J. (2020). Conducting Quantitative Research in Education (1st ed.). Springer.
Rutberg, S., & Bouikidis, C. (2018). Exploring the Evidence: Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 45(2), 209-214.
Samsudeen, S. N., & Mohamed, R. (2019). University students’ intention to use e-learning systems A study of higher educational institutions in Sri Lanka. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(3), 219-238
https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-11-2018-0092
Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 935-943.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007
Shen, J. (2012). Social comparison, social presence, and enjoyment in the acceptance of social shopping websites. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(3), 198-212. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeb.2010.035292
Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). The Italian versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory-II: Psychometric properties and discriminant power. In M. A. Lange (Ed.), Leading-edge psychological tests and testing research (pp. 27-50). Nova Science Publishers.
Soper, D. S. (2022, May 24). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models. Danielsoper.
www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/default.aspx
Stangor, C. (2014). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). The effects of individual differences on e-learning users’ behaviour in developing countries: a structural equation model. Computers in Human Behaviour, 41, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.020
Tarhini, A., Masa’deh, R. E., Al-Busaidi, K. A., Mohammed, A. B., & Maqableh, M. (2017). Factors influencing students’ adoption of e-learning: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of International Education in Business, 10(2), 164-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-09-2016-0032
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1),156-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Watjatrakul, B. (2016). Online learning adoption: effects of neuroticism, openness to experience, and perceived values. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 13(3), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-06-2016-0017
Weerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., Al-Sobhi, F., Shareef, M. A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2013). Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: an empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 716-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.05.001
Wu, J. H., & Wang, Y. M. (2006). Measuring KMS Success: A Respecification of the DeLone and McLean’s Model. Journal of Information & Management, 43, 728-739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The submitting author warrants that the submission is original and that she/he is the author of the submission together with the named co-authors; to the extend the submission incorporates text passages, figures, data, or other material from the work of others, the submitting author has obtained any necessary permission.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY What does this mean?). This is to get more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for you, the authors.
