DEFENDING MENTAL CAUSATION BY APPEALING TO GROUNDING
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Recently, Clark and Wildman have argued against a thesis
about mental causation, due to Kroedel and Schulz, called
the causal grounding thesis. A programmatic idea driving
the causal grounding thesis is that instances of mental
causation are always grounded by corresponding instances
of purely physical causation. The causal grounding thesis
goes beyond this programmatic idea by providing a
substantial specification of how this occurs. The causal
grounding thesis is of considerable philosophical interest
because it is instrumental in Kroedel and Schulz’s attempt
to develop non-reductive physicalism about the mind in
such a way that the infamous exclusion problem is avoided.
This paper extends Kroedel and Schulz’s defense of the
causal grounding thesis and replies to Clark and Wildman’s
concerns.
Article Details
References
Bach, Kent. “Content: Wide and Narrow,” Routledge Encyclopedia of
Philosophy (Version 1.0), London: Routledge.1998.
Brown, Curtis. “Narrow Mental Content”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 2016.
Burge, Tyler. “Individualism and the Mental”, Midwest Studies in
Philosophy, 4: 73–121. 1979.
Burge, Tyler. “Individualism and Psychology”, The Philosophical Review,
(1): 3–45. 1986.
Clark, Michael and Liggins, David. Recent work on grounding. Analysis,
(4), 812–823. 2012.
Clark, Michael & Wildman, Nathan. Grounding, mental causation, and
overdetermination. Synthese 195 (8):3723-3733. 2018.
Correia, Fabric. & Schnieder, Benjamin. (eds.) Metaphysical Grounding:
Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge University
Press. 2012.
Crane, Tim. “All the Difference in the World,” Philosophical Quarterly,
: 1–25. 1991.
Crane, Tim. & Mellor, Hugh. ‘There is No Question of Physicalism’,
Mind, 99, pp. 185-206. 1990.
Dasgupta, Shamik. The Possibility of Physicalism. Journal of Philosophy,
, 557–592. 2014.
Fine, Kit. XIV—Ontological Dependence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian
Society 95 (1):269-290. 1995
Fine, Kit. The question of realism. Philosophers Imprint, 1(2), 1–30. 2001.
Fine, Kit. Guide to Ground. In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder
(eds.), Metaphysical Grounding. Cambridge University Press. pp.
—80. 2012.
Fodor, Jerry. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy
of Mind, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 1987.
Kim, Jaegwon. Mind in a Physical World: An essay on the mind-body
mental causation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1998a.
Kim, Jaegwon. Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton:
Princeton University Press. 2005.
Kroedel, Thomas. and Schulz, Moritz. Grounding mental causation.
Synthese 193 (6):1909-1923. 2016.
List, Christian. & Menzies, Peter. Nonreductive Physicalism and the
Limits of the Exclusion Principle. Journal of Philosophy 106
(9):475-502. 2009.
Pappas, George. “Internalist vs. Externalist Conceptions of Epistemic
Justification”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall
Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). 2017.
Putnam, Hilary. Philosophy and our mental life. In H. Putnam
(Ed.), Philosophical Papers (pp. 291-303). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. 1975.
Ricki Bliss & Kelly Trogdon, Metaphysical grounding. Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy,2008
Rowlands, Mark., Lau, Joe. and Deutsch, Max. “Externalism About the
Mind”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020
Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 2020.
Schaffer, Jonathan. Contrastive causation. Philosophical Review, 114,
–358. 2005.
Schaffer, Jonathan. “On What Grounds What.” In Metametaphysics: New
Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, ed. D. J. Chalmers, D.
Manley and R. Wasserman. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2009.
Schaffer, Jonathan. Grounding, transitivity and contrastivity. Edited
by Correia & Schnieder, 2012, 122–138. Cambridge University
Press. 2012.
Schaffer, Jonathan. What Not to Multiply Without Necessity, Australasian
Journal of Philosophy, 93:4, 644-664. 2015.
Schaffer, Jonathan. The Ground Between the Gaps. Philosophers’ Imprint
2017.
Stenwall, Robin. A grounding physicalist solution to the causal exclusion.
Synthese 2020.
Tahko, Tuomas. and Lowe, Edward J. “Ontological Dependence”, The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Edward
N. Zalta (ed.). 2020.