Drivers of Undergraduate Student Satisfaction with Smart Campus Technology: Insights from Chengdu

Main Article Content

Zhaoyan Li

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the primary factors affecting student satisfaction and continuance intention towards the Smart Campus at Xihua University in Chengdu, Sichuan. The conceptual framework interlinks system quality, information quality, service quality, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, user satisfaction, and continuance intention. Research design, data, and methodology: A quantitative approach was employed, involving a survey with 500 samples distributed among undergraduate students from four majors with strong IT literacy. The study utilized a multistage sampling technique, including Purposive and Convenience Sampling, to gather data. The analysis used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Furthermore, the analysis included assessments of model fit, correlation validity, and reliability for each component. Results: The findings indicated that perceived usefulness and user satisfaction had the most significant direct effects on continuance intention (CI), with perceived ease of use showing the strongest indirect effect. The impact of system quality. service quality, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and information quality on satisfaction diminished in a sequential manner. Conclusions: In order to make students realize the effectiveness and convenience of smart campuses, stakeholders such as Smart Campus enterprises, software developers, higher education institutions, school administrators, teachers, and IT workers should pay attention to the potential variables that have a significant impact on smart campus satisfaction and continued use intention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Li, Z. (2025). Drivers of Undergraduate Student Satisfaction with Smart Campus Technology: Insights from Chengdu. AU-GSB E-JOURNAL, 18(4), 261-272. Retrieved from https://assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/AU-GSB/article/view/8578
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Zhaoyan Li

Information Network Center, Xihua University, China.

References

Abdul Rahim, N. A., Shafie, N. A., & Hossain, M. M. (2023). Factors influencing students’ intention to use e-learning platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 2131-2148.

Ahmed, V., Abu Alnaaj, K., & Saboor, S. (2020). An investigation into stakeholders’ perception of smart campus criteria: The American University of Sharjah as a case study. Sustainability, 12(12), 5187. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125187

Ahn, T., Ryu, S., & Han, I. (2007). The impact of web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing. Information & Management, 44(3), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.12.008

Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital learning and digital institution in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(1), 1.

https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010088

Alessandro, M., Palumbo, R., & Vassallo, P. (1988). The role of the family in the transition to adulthood: An exploratory study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17(4), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536645

Ali, M., Puah, C.-H., Fatima, S., Hashmi, A., & Ashfaq, M. (2022). Student e-learning service quality, satisfaction, commitment, and behaviours towards finance courses in COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(6), 892-907. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2021-0133

Ambalov, I. A. (2021). An investigation of technology trust and habit in IT use continuance: A study of a social network. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 23(1), 53-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-05-2019-0096

Arbuckle, J. L. (1995). Amos 4.0 user’s guide. Smallwaters Corporation.

Beran, T., & Violato, C. (2010). The role of self-regulation in the learning process: A review of the literature. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(1), 36-56.

Bharati, P., & Chaudhury, A. (2004). An empirical investigation of decision-making satisfaction in web-based decision support systems. Decision Support Systems, 37(2), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00006-X

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Chagnon-Lessard, N., Gosselin, L., Barnabe, S., Bello-Ochende, T., Fendt, S., Goers, S., Silva, L. C. P. D., Schweiger, B., Simmons, R., Vandersickel, A., & Zhang, P. (2021). Smart campuses: Extensive review of the last decade of research and current challenges. IEEE Access, 9, 124200-124234. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3109516

Chang, C. (2013). Exploring the determinants of e-learning systems continuance intention in academic libraries. Library Management, 34(1/2), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121311298261

Chen, L., Zhang, D., & Li, H. (2018). Understanding users’ continuance intention to use e-learning systems: A framework integrating user satisfaction, technology acceptance, and social influence. Computers & Education, 127, 203-217.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.001

Cheng, Y.-M. (2014). Why do users intend to continue using the digital library? An integrated perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(6), 640-662. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-05-2013-0042

Cheng, Y.-M. (2020). Quality antecedents and performance outcome of cloud-based hospital information system continuance intention. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(3), 654-683.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2019-0107

Cheng, Y.-M. (2021). Drivers of physicians’ satisfaction and continuance intention toward the cloud-based hospital information system. Kybernetes, 50(2), 413-442. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2019-0628

Cheng, Y.-M. (2022a). Can tasks and learning be balanced? A dual-pathway model of cloud-based e-learning continuance intention and performance outcomes. Kybernetes, 51(1), 210-240. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2020-0440

Cheng, Y.-M. (2022b). Which quality determinants cause MOOCs continuance intention? A hybrid extending the expectation-confirmation model with learning engagement and information systems success. Library Hi Tech, 4(3), 30-40.

https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-11-2021-0391

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Dokhanian, S., Roustapisheh, N., Heidari, S., & Rezvani, S. (2022). The effectiveness of system quality, habit, and effort expectation on library application use intention: The mediating role of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user satisfaction. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2022.10049515

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Foroughi, B., Iranmanesh, M., Hyun, S. S., & Nikbin, D. (2023). Determinants of students’ continuance intention toward online course platforms: A stimulus-organism-response perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 33(1), 1-23.

Gao, L., & Bai, X. (2014). An empirical study on continuance intention of mobile social networking services: Integrating the IS success model, network externalities and flow theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(2), 168-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-07-2013-0086

Hair, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.016

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Education.

Harsasi, R., & Sutawijaya, A. (2018). The influence of e-learning quality on student satisfaction and loyalty in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(3), 364-378.

Hong, W., Thong, J. Y. L., Wong, W.-K., & Tam, K. Y. (2013). Reflective belief and intention toward online shopping: The role of social influence. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 45-54.

Hossain, M. M. (2016). An overview of user satisfaction models in e-learning. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 12(2), 101-119.

Hossain, M. S., Rahman, M. A., & Hassan, M. S. (2021). Factors affecting the continuance intention to use e-learning system: An empirical investigation on students’ perspectives. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6651-6670.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10550-8

Hu, Y., & Zhang, J. (2016). The effects of users' perceived trust and perceived risk on their continuous intention to use mobile payment services. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 394-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.042

Hussein, A. K., Kahn, M. S., & Abedin, S. (2021). Investigating the factors affecting the adoption of e-learning: A study on higher education institutions in Bangladesh. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5653-5674.

Iqbal, M., Rafiq, M., & Soroya, S. H. (2022). Examining predictors of digital library use: An application of the information system success model. The Electronic Library, 40(4), 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2022-0008

Jami Pour, M., Mesrabadi, J., & Asarian, M. (2022). Meta-analysis of the DeLone and McLean models in e-learning success: The moderating role of user type. Online Information Review, 46(3), 590-615. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2021-0011

Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., & Angst, C. M. (2006). Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance research. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 781. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148754

Kim, T. G., Lee, J. H., & Law, R. (2008). An empirical examination of the acceptance behaviour of hotel front office systems: An extended technology acceptance model. Tourism Management, 29(3), 500-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.016

Kim, Y., & Lee, H. S. (2014). Quality, perceived usefulness, user satisfaction, and intention to use: An empirical study of ubiquitous personal robot service. Asian Social Science, 10(11), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n11p1

Kumar, P., Kumar, P., Garg, R. K., Panwar, M., & Aggarwal, V. (2023). A study on teachers’ perception towards e-learning adoption in higher educational institutions in India during the COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education, Skills, and Work-Based Learning, 13(4), 720-738. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-03-2022-0052

Li, Z., & Zhao, C. (2019). Research on smart campus construction (1st ed.). China Water & Power Press.

Liao, C., Chen, J. L., & Hsieh, Y. C. (2009). Exploring the role of flow experience in the online shopping context. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 885-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.008

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.

Lin, H. (2007). The role of online and offline features in sustaining virtual communities: An empirical study. Internet Research, 17(2), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240710736997

Lin, H.-F. (2015). The role of social capital in influencing the intention to adopt e-learning: A case study in Taiwan. Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 78-91.

Malhotra, N. K., Birks, D. F., & Wills, P. (2007). Marketing research: An applied approach (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.

Mandari, H. E., & Koloseni, D. N. (2023). Determinants of continuance intention of using e-government services in Tanzania: The role of system interactivity as moderating factor. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(1), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-05-2022-0077

Masrek, M. N. (2007). Measuring user satisfaction with computerised library systems: A case study in a public university in Malaysia. Computer and Information Science, 1(1), 1-12.

Mishalani, R. G., McCord, M. R., Goel, P., & Ohio State University. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science. (2011). Smart campus transit laboratory for research and education. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/23767

Misra, P., Chopra, G., & Bhaskar, P. (2023). Continuous usage intention for digital library systems among students at higher learning institutions: Moderating role of academic involvement. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(5), 1752-1766. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-06-2022-0185

Mohammad, S. A. A., Ahmad, H., Zulhumadi, F., & Abubakar, F. M. (2018). Relationships between system quality, service quality, and customer satisfaction: M-commerce in the Jordanian context. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 20(1), 73-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-03-2017-0016

Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of information and system quality: An empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 199-235.

https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045823

Park, J., & Kim, Y. G. (2003). Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550310457818

Pedroso, A. L., Lamas, R. M., & Almeida, F. A. (2016). A systematic review of software engineering metrics. Journal of Systems and Software, 121, 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.005

Perera, L., & Abeysekera, I. (2022). Examining the impact of social capital on the intention to adopt digital payment systems: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Business Research, 142, 1090-1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.042

Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2013). Information systems success: The quest for the independent variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 7-62. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290401

Pickard, A. J. (2007). Research methods in information (2nd ed.). Facet Publishing.

Rafique, H., Alroobaea, R., Munawar, B. A., Krichen, M., Rubaiee, S., & Bashir, A. K. (2021). Do digital students show an inclination toward continuous use of academic library applications? A case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(2), 102298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102298

Rezvani, S., Hossain, M. S., & Cummings, L. L. (2022). Technology acceptance model in the context of smart home technologies: A systematic literature review. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 17(1), 13-27.

Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003

Saoula, O., Shamim, A., Mohd Suki, N., Ahmad, M. J., Abid, M. F., Patwary, A. K., & Abbasi, A. Z. (2023). Building e-trust and e-retention in online shopping: The role of website design, reliability, and perceived ease of use. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 27(2), 178-201. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-07-2022-0159

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Seddon, P., & Kiew, M.-Y. (1996). A partial test and development of DeLone and McLean’s model of IS success. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v4i1.379

Sharma, P., Nahar, S., & Kaushik, M. (2022). Exploring the factors influencing students’ continuance intention to use e-learning platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3567-3592.

Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). The role of technology in the promotion of social well-being and development. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 32(3), 217-228.

Sun, W. (2022). Construction of smart campus in universities under the background of big data intelligence. In J. C. Hung, J.-W. Chang, Y. Pei, & W.-C. Wu (Eds.), Innovative computing (pp. 537-544). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4258-6_67

Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005