Exploring What Drives College Students' Satisfaction in Learning Xinjiang Landscape Painting: A Case Study at an Art College in Yichang, China
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to explore the factors that affect the satisfaction of college students with the "creation and learning of Xiajiang landscape painting." The conceptual framework in the study put forward the co-presence, interactivity, intimacy, immersion, confirmation, and interaction factor with significant impact on relationship satisfaction. Research design, data, and methodology: A questionnaire survey was conducted among 100 college students in the School of Art of China Three Gorges University after quantitative reliability and validity analyses. The questionnaire was distributed online. Full-time student in the Art College of Three Gorges University (n =100) Experimental group for Intervention Design Implementation (IDI): Full-time student from the same school (n = 30). Results: The result is displayed as Intimacy, Co-presence having a significant impact on satisfaction. Interaction Factor significantly impacts satisfaction. Finally, the results from the paired-sample t-test for comparison demonstrated a significant difference in co-presence, intimacy, and interaction, and satisfaction between the post-IDI and pre-IDI stages. Conclusions: According to the data collection analysis, the three research hypotheses in the paper are supported. It has a significant effect on satisfaction. Develop teaching plans for the higher. It is suggested that more in-depth studies should be made on many influencing factors. Optimize the teaching program.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submitting author warrants that the submission is original and that she/he is the author of the submission together with the named co-authors; to the extend the submission incorporates text passages, figures, data, or other material from the work of others, the submitting author has obtained any necessary permission.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY What does this mean?). This is to get more legal certainty about what readers can do with published articles, and thus a wider dissemination and archiving, which in turn makes publishing with this journal more valuable for you, the authors.
References
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2-3), 82-103.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x
Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
Andersson, A., & Hatakka, M. (2010). Increasing interactivity in distance education: Case studies Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Information Technology for Development, 16(1), 16-33.
Asoodar, M., Vaezi, S., & Izanloo, B. (2016). Framework to improve e-learner satisfaction and further strengthen e-learning implementation. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 704-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.030
Barbara, F. (1996). Effects of tutor-tutee intimacy, tutoring conditions, and tutor background on college student tutor satisfaction. Educational Studies, 22(2), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569960220203
Barnhart, R. M., Yang, X., Nie, C., Lang, S., James, C., & Wu, H. (1997). Three thousand years of Chinese painting (1st ed.). Yale University Press.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
Bokyung, K., & Youngsoo, K. (2008). Investigation of the relationships between media characteristics, presence, flow, and learning effects in augmented reality-based learning. International Journal for Education Media and Technology, 2(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9313-0_3
Cao, X., Masood, A., Luqman, A., & Ali, A. (2018). Excessive use of mobile social networking sites and poor academic performance: Antecedents and consequences from stressor-strain-outcome perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.023
Chiem, K. (2017). Painting, peonies, and Ming loyalism in Qing-Dynasty China. Archives of Asian Art, 67(1), 83-109.
Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Effect of an initiating action on the up-right/down-left advantage for vertically arrayed stimuli and horizontally arrayed responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 472-484. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.472
Chun, W. W., Nian, S. C., & Kinshuk, K. (2012). A model for social presence in online classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 529-545.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Elliott, K. M., & Healy, M. A. (2001). Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v10n04_01
Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2000). The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49, 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520009379209
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings (1st ed.). The Free Press.
Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 6-9.
Guo, A., & Zeng, B. (2023). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in modern education. Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 123-135.
Guo, Y., Zeng, D., Zhang, X., & Li, X. (2022). Exploring the factors influencing digital library user satisfaction and loyalty: An empirical study. The Electronic Library, 40(4), 589-606.
Huang, Y. M. (2019). Examining students continued use of desktop services: Perspectives from expectation confirmation and social influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.004
Ifinedo, P. (2017). Empirical study of Nova Scotia nurses' adoption of healthcare information systems: Implications for management and policy-making. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(4), 317-327.
https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.96
Ifinedo, P., Pyke, J., & Anwar, A. (2017). Business undergraduates’ perceived use outcomes of Moodle, an open-source learning management system: The roles of usability factors and external support. Journal of Information Systems Education, 28(4), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.001
Jiang, S., Huang, Q., Ye, Q., & Gao, W. (2006). An effective method to detect and categorize digitized traditional Chinese paintings. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(7), 734-746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.013
Jie, L., & Xin, Z. (2017). Influences of literati painting on garden-making: A comparative study of Yuan ye (The Craft of Gardens) and Fu sheng liu ji (Six Chapters of a Floating Life). Gardens & Designed Landscapes, 37(4), 336-341.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14601176.2017.1322842
Jung, T. H., & Dieck, M. C. (2017). Augmented reality, virtual reality, and 3D printing for the co-creation of value for the visitor experience at cultural heritage places. Journal of Place Management and Development, 10(2), 140-151.
https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmd-07-2016-0045
Kathleen, E. (2004). The impact of perceived teacher confirmation on receiver apprehension, motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 53(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452032000135742
Kim, H., Shin, Y., Kim, Y., & Suh, M. (2001). The use of 3D virtual reality technique in the web-based earth science education. Journal of Educational Technology, 17(3), 85-116.
Kim, Y. J. (2000). A study of the immersion program in English education of children: Kindergarten immersion group vs EFL group. English Linguistic Science, 1(5), 535-548.
Kurucay, M., & Inan, F. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 115, 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116686732
Larson, R. (1988). Flow and writing. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 150-171). Cambridge University Press.
Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers and Education, 54(2), 506-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. B. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x
Luo, N., Zhang, M., & Qi, D. (2017). Effects of different interactions on students’ sense of community in e-learning environments. Computers and Education, 115, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.006
Madden, M., & Carli, L. (1981, March). Students’ satisfaction with graduate school and attributions of control and responsibility. [Paper Presentation]. the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, NY.
Mahnaz, M. (2015). The impact of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools on learner self-regulation, social presence, immediacy, intimacy, and satisfaction in collaborative online learning. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 3(3), 20-90.
Mayers, P. (1978). Flow in adolescence and its relation to the school experience [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Chicago.
Millar, F., & Rogers, L. (1976). A relational approach to interpersonal communication. Sage Publications.
Mohan, M., Rajendiran, K., Gunasekaran, V., & Cassinadane, A. (2022). Face to face education to virtual classroom in the health sector during the COVID pandemic. Journal of Education Technology in Health Sciences, 8(3), 105-110.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Morton, T. L., & Douglas, M. A. (1981). Growth of relationships. In S. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Personal relationships 2: Developing personal relationships (pp. 75-90). Academic Press.
Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (1996). Measuring the flow experience among web users (1st ed.). Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Park, J. Y. (2015). Student interactivity and teacher participation: An application of legitimate peripheral participation in higher education online learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3), 389-406.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.935743
Park, S., & Kim, Y. (2006). An inquiry on the relationships among learning-flow factors, flow level, and achievement under an online learning environment. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 14(1), 93-115.
Pelet, J. E., Ettis, S., & Cowart, K. (2017). Optimal experience of flow enhanced by telepresence: Evidence from social media use. Information and Management, 54, 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.05.001
Powers, S., & Rossman, M. (1985). Student satisfaction with graduate education: Dimensionality and assessment in college education. Psychology: A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, 22(2), 46-49.
Qian, G., Lan, L. Z., & Qing, F. Z. (2023). What social factors influence learners’ continuous intention in online learning? A social presence perspective. Information Technology & People, 36(3), 1076-1094. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-09-2021-0777
Queiros, D. R., & de Villiers, M. R. (2016). Online learning in a South African higher education institution: Determining the right connections for the student. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 165-185. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2552
Ramessur, R. T., & Santally, M. I. (2007). Computer-mediated communication for effective teaching-learning of the coastal zone management module. International Journal of Education & Development Using Information & Communication Technology, 3(1), 116-125.
Rebecca, A. C. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314-324.
Rodriguez, A. I., & Meseguer, A. A. (2016). E-learning continuance: The impact of interactivity and the mediating role of imagery, presence, and flow. Information and Management, 53(4), 504-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.11.005
Samar, R., & Ghani, M. A. (2019). Integration of expectation confirmation theory and self-determination theory in internet banking continuance intention. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 6, 57-70.
Sheng, J., & Jiang, J. (2014). Recognition of Chinese artists via windowed and entropy balanced fusion in classification of their authored ink and wash paintings (IWPs). Pattern Recognition, 47(2), 612-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2013.07.006
Su, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Liu, X., & Lee, S. H. (2005). The importance of interaction in web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1), 1-19.
Sweeney, J. C., & Ingram, D. (2001). A comparison of traditional and web-based tutorials in marketing education: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475301231008
Tawfik, A., Giabbanelli, P., Hogan, M., Msilu, F., Gill, A., & York, C. (2018). Effects of success vs. failure cases on learner-learner interaction. Computers and Education, 118, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.003
Van, N. S., & Rogers, K. (2016). E-learning, dual-task, and cognitive load: The anatomy of a failed experiment. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(2), 186-196. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1549
Wei, C. W., Chen, N. S., & Kinshuk, K. (2012). A model for social presence in online classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 529-545.
Weili, S. (2017). A generative approach to Chinese Shanshui painting. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 37(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2017.4
Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686
Wood, J. T. (2002). Interpersonal communication: Everyday encounters (3rd ed.). Wadsworth.
Yung, A. (2020). The influence of digital technologies on learning outcomes in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 18(3), 45-59.
Zeng, J., Zuo, J., Li, H., & Huang, K. (2022). A systematic review of sustainable construction: Frameworks and practices in developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129910
Zhou, J. (2017). Exploring the factors affecting learners’ continuance intention of MOOCs for online collaborative learning: An extended ECM perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2914