Determinants of College Students' Intentions and Usage Patterns in Online Learning

Main Article Content

Qiu Ling

Abstract

Purpose: This research paper investigates the main influences on students' online learning behavioral intention and use behavior in five universities in Chengdu. The conceptual framework proposes a causal relationship between facilitating conditions, performance expectancy, effort expectation, social influence, satisfaction, behavioral intention, and usage behavior. Research design, data, and methodology: The researcher used a quantitative method (n=500) to distribute a questionnaire to students in five universities. The questionnaire consisted of four main parts, which included screening questions and correlation measures for all variables. These questions were closed-ended questions created using a limited five-point Likert scale, and the data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), which included model fit, reliability, and validity of the constructs. Results: The results indicated that facilitating conditions, performance expectations, effort expectations, social influences, and satisfaction had a significant effect on behavioral intentions and use behavior, with effort expectations having the greatest effect on satisfaction, followed by performance expectations, satisfaction, facilitating conditions, and social influences, respectively. Conclusions: It can be seen that online learning can develop students' ability to learn independently, build a content-rich online self-study platform for students, integrate a variety of information and resources, and maximize the platform for students to exchange, communicate, and cooperate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ling, Q. (2025). Determinants of College Students’ Intentions and Usage Patterns in Online Learning. AU-GSB E-JOURNAL, 18(4), 142-153. Retrieved from https://assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/AU-GSB/article/view/8508
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Qiu Ling

Sichuan University of Media and Communications, China.

References

Ab Jalil, H., Ma’rof, A., & Omar, R. (2019). Attitude and behavioral intention to develop and use MOOCs among academics. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(24), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i24.12105

Al-Gahtani, S., Hubona, G., & Wang, J. (2007). Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT. Information & Management, 44(8), 681-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.09.002

Almaiah, M. A., & Alismaiel, O. A. (2019). Examination of factors influencing the use of mobile learning system: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 885-909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9810-7

Al-Mamary, Y. H., & Shamsuddin, A. (2015). Testing of the technology acceptance model in context of Yemen. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 268-273. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p268

Almarashdeh, I. A., Sahari, N., Zin, N. A. M., & Alsmadi, M. (2010). The success of learning management systems among distance learners in Malaysian universities. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 21(2), 80-91.

Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance: The role of openness and reputation. Computers & Education, 80, 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006

Alshurideh, M. T., Salloum, S. A., Al Kurdi, B., Abdel Monem, A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Understanding the quality determinants that influence the intention to use mobile learning platforms: A practical study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 13(11), 157. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i11.10300

Awang, Z. (2012). A Handbook on SEM: Structural Equation Modeling (4th ed). Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Press.

Ayala, C., Dick, G., & Treadway, J. (2014). The MOOCs are coming! Revolution or fad in the business school? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 35(1), 225-243. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03512

Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 607-627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.607

Baker, A. (2003). Faculty development for teaching online: Educational and technological issues. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 34(6), 273-278. https://doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-20031101-10

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921

Brown, S. A., Dennis, A. R., & Venkatesh, V. (2016). Predicting collaboration technology use: Integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 9-53.

https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222270201

Browne, K. (2005). Snowball Sampling: Using Social Networks to Research Non-heterosexual Women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice, 8(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000081663

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Multivariate applications series. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Cao, Y., Ajjan, H., & Hong, P. (2013). Using social media applications for educational outcomes in college teaching: A structural equation analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 581-593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12066

Chao, C. M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652

Chen, P. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222-1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008

Cheung, M. W. L. (2015). Meta‐analysis: A structural equation modeling approach (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003

Chiu, C.-M., & Wang, E. T. (2008). Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value. Information & Management, 45(3), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.02.003

Choi, H., Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2011). Driving factors of post-adoption behavior in mobile data services. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1212-1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.028

Chu, T. H., & Chen, Y. Y. (2016). With good we become good: Understanding e-learning adoption by theory of planned behavior and group influences. Computers & Education, 92, 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.013

Cigdem, H., & Ozturk, M. (2016). Factors affecting students’ behavioral intention to use LMS at a Turkish post-secondary vocational school. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 276-295.

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2253

Cimperman, M., Brenčič, M. M., & Trkman, P. (2016). Analyzing older users’ home telehealth services acceptance behavior: Applying an extended UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 90, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.002

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dabbagh, N., & NannaRitland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application (1st ed.). Pearson.

DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., & Schutz, P. A. (2017). Developing a mixed methods proposal (1st ed.). Sage Publications.

Deng, L., Turner, D. E., Gehling, R., & Prince, B. (2010). User experience, satisfaction, and continual usage intention of IT. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(1), 60-75. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.50

Dhaqane, M. K., & Afrah, N. A. (2016). Satisfaction of student and academic performance in Benadir University. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 59-63.

Diep, N. A., Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C., & Vanwing, T. (2016). Predicting adult learners’ online participation: Effects of altruism, performance expectancy, and social capital. Computers & Education, 101, 84-101.

Hoyle, R. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (1st ed.). The Guilford Press.

Hu, P., Clark, T., & Ma, W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information & Management, 41(2), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00050-8

Im, I., Hong, S., & Kang, M. S. (2011). An international comparison of technology adoption. Information & Management, 48(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.09.001

Jaschik, S. (2009, May 14). The evidence on online education. Inside Higher Ed. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/06/29/online

Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, E. K. (2011). Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness, and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education, 57, 1654-1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008

Joo, Y. J., So, H.-J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students' self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122, 260-272.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003

Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2010). The effect of Twitter on college student and engagement and success. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 119-132.

Kim, J., & Lee, K. S.-S. (2020). Conceptual model to predict Filipino teachers’ adoption of ICT-based instruction in class: Using the UTAUT model. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1776213

Kim, J., & Lee, W. (2011). Assistance and possibilities: Analysis of learning-related factors affecting the online learning satisfaction of underprivileged students. Computers and Education, 57(4), 2395-2405.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.015

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.

Lai, C. (2015). Modeling teachers' influence on learners' self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 82, 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.005

Lee, J.-W. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 277-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.08.002

Liaw, S.-S., & Huang, H.-M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60, 14-24.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015

Lin, S., Zimmer, J. C., & Lee, V. (2013). Podcasting acceptance on campus: The differing perspectives of teachers and students. Computers & Education, 68, 416-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.003

Lo, C. C. (2010). How student satisfaction factors affect perceived learning. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 47-54.

Lu, R., Zhao, X., & Li, J. (2020). Genomic Characterization and Epidemiology of 2019 Novel Coronavirus: Implications for Virus Origins and Receptor Binding. The Lancet, 395, 565-574.

Marchewka, J. T., Liu, C., & Kostiwa, K. (2014). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6687.1038

Martirosyan, N. M., Hwang, E., & Wanjohi, R. (2015). Impact of English proficiency on academic performance of international students. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v5i1.443

Mayadas, F., Bourne, J., & Bacsich, P. (2019). ONLINE EDUCATION TODAY. Online Learning, 13(2), 1-10.

https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i2.1667

Miller, M. T., & Lu, M. Y. (2003). Serving non-traditional students in e-learning environments: Building successful communities in the virtual campus. Educational Media International, 40(1-2), 163-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952398032000092206

Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044

Moore, M. G. (2003). Learner support. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 141-143.

Nabity-Grover, T., Cheung, C. M., & Thatcher, J. B. (2020). Inside out and outside in: How the COVID-19 pandemic affects self-disclosure on social media. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102188

Nicholas-Omoregbe, O. S., Azeta, A. A., Chiazor, I. A., & Omoregbe, N. (2017). Predicting the adoption of e-learning management system: A case of selected private universities in Nigeria. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 106-121.

Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use. Computers & Education, 109, 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405

Paola Torres Maldonado, U., Feroz Khan, G., Moon, J., & Jeung Rho, J. (2010). E-learning motivation and educational portal acceptance in developing countries. Online Information Review, 35(1), 66-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521111113597

Parsad, B., & Lewis, L. (2008). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2006-2007 (NCES 2009-044) (1st ed.). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences. U.S. Department of Education.

Pedroso, J. S., Silva, E. A., & Campos, A. C. (2016). The role of organizational culture in the management of information systems. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 13(2), 115-132.

Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236-263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15

Phuong, N. N. D., Luan, L. T., Dong, V. V., & Khanh, N. L. N. (2020). Examining customers’ continuance intentions towards e-wallet usage: The emergence of mobile payment acceptance in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 505-516. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO9.505

Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001

Saadé, R., & Bahli, B. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in online learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Information Management, 42(2), 317-327.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.06.002

Salloum, S. A., & Shaalan, K. (2018). Factors affecting students' acceptance of e-learning systems in higher education using UTAUT and structural equation modeling approaches. International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics, 457-466. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99010-1_43

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (1st ed.). Prentice Hall.

Shahijan, M. K., Rezaei, S., & Amin, M. (2016). International students’ course satisfaction and continuance behavioral intention in higher education setting: An empirical assessment in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(1), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9410-9

Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (2005). The role of market orientation in firm performance: A comparative analysis of the role of innovation and marketing capability. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 1-16.

Sharma, S. K., Sarrab, M., & Al-Shihi, H. (2016). Development and validation of mobile learning acceptance measure. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1224250

Sheila, C., & Hidayati, A. (2021). Customer loyalty in the digital wallet industry: The role of satisfaction, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, and habit. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 196, 114-121.

Shen, C., Ho, J., Ly, P. T. M., & Kuo, T. (2019). Behavioral intentions of using virtual reality in learning: Perspectives of acceptance of information technology and learning style. Virtual Reality, 23(3), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0348-1

Sica, C., & Ghisi, M. (2007). Assessing model fit: Practical guidelines for structural equation modeling. Journal of Structural Equation Modeling, 14(2), 234-256.

Sinclaire, J. K. (2014). An empirical investigation of student satisfaction with college courses. Research in Higher Education Journal, 22, 1-12.

Soper, D. S. (2019). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [Software]. http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc

Stallings, D. (2002). Measuring success in the virtual university. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(1), 47-53.

Suldo, S., Minch, D., & Hearon, B. (2015). Adolescent life satisfaction and personality characteristics: Investigating relationships using a five-factor model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(4), 947-969.

Sung, H.-N., Jeong, D.-Y., Jeong, Y.-S., & Shin, J.-I. (2015). The relationship among self-efficacy, social influence, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and behavioral intention in mobile learning service. International Journal of u-and e-Service, Science and Technology, 8(9), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijunesst.2015.8.9.21

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.

Taiwo, A. A., & Downe, A. G. (2013). The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A meta-analytic review of empirical findings. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 49(1), 48-58.

Tan, P. J. B. (2013). Applying the UTAUT to understand factors affecting the use of English e-learning websites in Taiwan. SAGE Open, 3(4), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013503837

Tang, L. P., & Austin, M. J. (2009). Students' perceptions of teaching technologies, application of technologies, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1241-1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.007

Teo, T., & Wong, S. L. (2013). Modeling key drivers of e-learning satisfaction among student teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(1), 71-95. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.1.d

Thomson, L. D. (2010). Beyond the classroom walls: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on how online learning can meet the needs of gifted students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(4), 662-712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1002100407

Timothy, D. J., & Tosun, C. (2003). Tourists’ Perceptions of the Canada-USA Border as a Barrier to Tourism at the International Peace Garden. Tourism Management, 24, 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00113-9

Tosuntas, S. B., Karadag, B. E., & Orhan, S. (2015). The factors affecting acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard within the scope of FATIH project: A structural equation model based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Computers & Education, 81(2), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.007

Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K., & Kirs, P. J. (2011). Using SERVQUAL to assess the quality of e-learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1272-1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.009

Urdan, T. A., & Weggen, C. C. (2000). Corporate e-learning: Exploring a new frontier (1st ed.). WR Hambrecht Co.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.

Wang, Y. S., & Shih, Y. W. (2009). Why do people use information kiosks? A validation of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.10.003

Wang, Z., Li, H., Ye, Q., & Law, R. (2016). Saliency effects of online reviews embedded in the description on sales: Moderating role of reputation. Decision Support Systems, 87(7), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.04.006

Wani, M., Raghavan, V., Abraham, D., & Kleist, V. (2017). Beyond utilitarian factors: User experience and travel company website successes. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(4), 769-785.

Winberg, T. M., & Hedman, L. (2008). Student attitudes toward learning, level of pre-knowledge and instruction type in a computer-simulation: Effects on flow experiences and perceived learning outcomes. Instructional Science, 36(3), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9030-9

Wu, J. H., & Wang, S. C. (2006). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(5), 735-744.

Yu, C., & Land, S. (2005). Facilitating conditions, wireless trust, and adoption intention. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(4), 17-25.

Yunus, M. M., Ang, W. S., & Hashim, H. (2021). Factors affecting teaching English as a second language (TESL) postgraduate students’ behavioral intention for online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(6), 3524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063524

Zacharis, G., & Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). Factors predicting university students’ behavioral intention to use eLearning platforms in the post-pandemic normal: An UTAUT2 approach with ‘learning value’. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 12065-12082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11116-2