Environmental Social Governance Score Influence on Financial Performance Amidst Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle Listed Companies

Main Article Content

Rotcharin Kunsrison
Trairong Swatdikun
Muttanachai Suttipun
Shubham Pathak
Lidya Primta Surbakti

Abstract

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores have been widely explored regarding their role on firm performance, yet few studies have examined their significance from a regional perspective. This research addresses this gap by analyzing the comprehensive impact of ESG scores within Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Guided by stakeholder-agency theory, which posits that higher ESG scores lead to improved firm performance, the study employs secondary data, including ESG scores from S&P Capital IQ Pro and firm performance measured by return on assets (ROA). Using a quantitative approach, the findings reveal that average ESG scores vary across the observations, with Thailand scoring highest (40.698), followed by Malaysia (25.032), and Indonesia (20.984). The results indicate a significant positive relationship between ESG scores and firm performance. Moreover, business risk, firm size, and growth rate, are found to exert a strong influence on firm performance, further emphasizing the importance of firm-specific characteristics alongside ESG practices in shaping corporate outcomes.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Adeneye, Y.B., Kammoun, I. and Ab Wahab, S.N.A. (2023). Capital structure and speed of adjustment: The impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(5), 945-977. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2022-0060

Alatawi, M. S., Daud, Z. M., & Johari, J. (2023). Methodologies and moderator-mediating factors of integrated reporting: A systematic review. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 3057-3080. doi:https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v33i.940

Busch, T., Bauer, R., & Orlitzky, M. (2016). Sustainable development and financial markets: Old paths and new avenues. Business & Society, 55(3), 303-329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315570701

Choi, A., Choi, J.-H., & Sohn, B. C. (2018). The joint effect of audit quality and legal regimes on the use of real earnings management: International evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(4), 2225-2257. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12370

Chung, R. K., Margolin, A., & Vyakina, I. (2023). Theory and practice of ESG transformation of management systems. Economic Policy, 2(2), 80-103. doi:https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2023-2-80-103

Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2508281

De Franco, C., Nicolle, J., & Tran, L. A. (2021). Sustainable investing: ESG versus SDG. The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing, 1(4), 45-62. doi:10.3905/jesg.2021.1.019

Duru, A., Hasan, I., Song, L., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Bank accounting regulations, enforcement mechanisms, and financial statement informativeness: cross-country evidence*. Accounting and Business Research, 50(3), 269-304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2017.1415801

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210-233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Halid, S., Rahman, R. A., Mahmud, R., Mansor, N., & Wahab, R. A. (2023). A literature review on ESG score and its impact on firm performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences, 13(1), 272-282. doi:10.6007/ijarafms/v13-i1/15101

Hawn, O., & Ioannou, I. (2016). Mind the gap: the interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibility. Strategic management journal, 37(13), 2569-2588.

Hilend, R., Bell, J. E., Griffis, S. E., & Macdonald, J. R. (2023). Illicit activity and scarce natural resources in the supply chain: A literature review, framework, and research agenda. Journal of Business Logistics, 44(2), 198-227.

Hill, C. and Jones, T. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131-154. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00657.x

Hodkam, S. (2016). “The study of relationship between the level of sustainability report disclosure and security prices of listed companies in the stock exchange of Thailand”. Master’s thesis, Graduate School of Commerce. Burapha University.

Hoffmann, V. H., & Busch, T. (2008). Corporate carbon performance indicators: Carbon intensity, dependency, exposure, and risk. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(4), 505-520. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00066.x

Khandelwal, V., Sharma, P., & Chotia, V. (2023). ESG disclosure and firm performance: An asset-pricing approach. Risks, 11(6), 112. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11060112

Koh, K. L., & Ahad, N. A. (2020). Normality for non-normal distributions. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 8(2), 51-60. doi: https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol8.2.7.2020

Kotsantonis, S., Pinney, C., & Serafeim, G. (2016). ESG integration in investment management: Myths and realities. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 10-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12169

Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., Tang, D. Y., & Zhong, R. (2021). The effects of mandatory ESG disclosure around the world. European Corporate Governance Institute–Finance Working Paper, 754, 21-44. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3832745

Kumpamool., C. (2024). Stock repurchases, ownership structure and board composition: Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Asia Business Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-06-2022-0200

Kwak, S. G., & Kim, J. H. (2017). Central limit theorem: The cornerstone of modern statistics. Korean journal of anesthesiology, 70(2), 144-156. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144.

Lusk, E. J., Halperin, M., & Heilig, F. (2011). A note on power differentials in data preparation between trimming and winsorizing. Business Management Dynamics, 1(2), 23-31. available at https://www.academia.edu/101071356/A_Note_on_Power_Differentials_in_Data_Preparation_between_Trimming_and_Winsorizing

Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Guthrie, J. (2016). On the shoulders of giants: Undertaking a structured literature review in accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(5), 767-801. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-1939

Murniati, S. (2016). Effect of capital structure, company size and profitability on the stock price of food and beverage companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange. Information Management and Business Review, 8(1), 23-29. doi:10.22610/imbr.v8i1.1192

Nguyen, T., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2015). Ownership concentration and corporate performance from a dynamic perspective: Does national governance quality matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 41, 148-161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.06.005

Park, M. J., & Kwon, S. M. (2014). Socioeconomic determinants of Korean medicine ambulatory services: Comparing panel fixed effect model with pooled ordinary least Square. Health policy and Management, 24(1), 47-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2014.24.1.47

Pérez, L., Hunt, V., Samandari, H., Nuttall, R., & Biniek, K. (2022). Does ESG really matter—and why. McKinsey Quarterly, 1-9. Retrieved from https://www.eticanews.it/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/does-esg-really-matter-and-why-vf.pdf

Phillips, J. J. (2012). Return on investment in training and performance improvement programs. Burlington: Routledge.

Rahman, R. A., & Alsayegh, M. F. (2021). Determinants of corporate environment, social and governance (ESG) reporting among Asian firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 167. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040167

S&P Capital IQ. (2023, 12 24). A single platform for essential intelligence. Retrieved from S&P Capital IQ: https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/solutions/sp-capital-iq-pro

Schmidheiny, K., & Basel, U. (2011). Panel data: Fixed and random effects. Short guides to microeconometrics, 7(1), 2-7. available at https://www.schmidheiny.name/teaching/panelmf.pdf

Serafeim, G. (2018). Investors as stewards of the commons? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 30(2), 8-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12294

Velte, P. (2016). Women on management board and ESG performance. Journal of Global Responsibility, 7(1), 98–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-01-2016-0001

Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an influence on firm performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-11-2016-0029